Samsung Galaxy The S6 has a 5,1″ display with Quad HD resolution, which is 2560×1440 pixels. That's a really great number for such a small display, but maybe a bit exaggerated and the display is so delicate that even the human eye can't recognize it. And as it turns out, Quad HD resolution in a mobile phone costs something, and the main cost is performance.
Server & Hosting AppleInsinder focused on Samsung's new flagship and conducted several performance tests, which he then compared with the one that was six months older. iPhone 6 to iPhone 6 Plus. They only have a 2-core processor and 1 GB of RAM, while Galaxy The S6 has an 8-core processor and 3GB of RAM. Apphunting iPhone is often criticized for its outdated computersonenty and users like to look at high numbers in phone specifications and then have iPhone considered obsolete. However, it is now confirmed that bigger numbers do not always mean higher performance.
And as we can see from the picture above, Apple iPhone 6 to iPhone 6 Plus, which have resolutions of 1334×750 and 1920×1080, beat the latest Samsung Galaxy S6 on full display. Not even an 8-core processor, 3 GB LPDDR4 RAM and a flash drive UFS 2.0 flash memory could not handle Quad HD resolution well enough to make the graphics powerful enough, as the parameters suggest. Even in the second test it was beaten by a year and a half older iPhone 5s.
*Source: BGR
Super, I'm looking forward to playing Angry Birds on such powerful graphics :D
Hooray, 4 stripes better adidas :))
They are also frog-like pretts… Sad-embarrassing……. ! ( … and what is it all for ??? )
It's all about the fact that even when they're on the phoneone use the best, fastest and most modern computersonenty, it doesn't necessarily mean that the phone is actually the fastest. One improperly used computer is enoughonent and the whole effort to provide the best for the customer is in trouble.
That's exactly why Apple does not use 8 core processors, 3GB RAM, 16 Mpix camera, Quad HD display. . .
In essence, it achieves comparable and often even better results with half the hardware.
When a company produces hardware and software exactly according to its needs, it must work better than when something is too universal.
So again the wonderful argumentation "when that Apple doesn't have it, so it's not needed"?
Now everyone sees 1GB of RAM as ideal, when it releases in the fall Apple so the phone with 2GB will be the most amazing best size 2GB. And when he does Apple Q-HD display, so it will be the most amazing display in the world, but now it is a useless unnecessary thing.
And then you wonder if someone calls you a sheep.
achmed: read the article again and then my comment
1.- I didn't write anywhere "when that Apple doesn't have it, so it's not needed"
2. – what works perfectly is ideal, and according to the article, Samsung apparently did not quite manage it perfectly.
3. – 1GB of RAM is by no means ideal, but the system is adapted to it and the average user does not haveancu notice that it has little RAM. 2GB is better and 4GB is even better.
4. – when Apple it uses a Q-HD display, so of course it will be better than what it uses today. But the question is: do we need to have a higher resolution on the mobile phone than on a 50″ TV? Even in the article it is written that the human eye cannot distinguish it. Anything beyond 400-500 PPI is useless and will harm the phone itself, because the nestwith graphics.
5. - the sheep is the one who buys iPhone because he is handsome but has absolutely no idea about the technical side. You are right. There are many sheep. But there are also people who don't see sheep Apple and they can't even name 2-3 relevant reasons.
Mam Apple products since 2008. I will defend my claims.
Sheep are individuals who count cores, frames and GHZ in mobile devices and think that the more cores and GHZ the better the mobile. I always thought people did it to compensate, but now it's kind of a crazy fad. What on earth is an octa core phone for? What the hell is it good for? I do not understand..