iPhone 6 to Samsung Galaxy The S6 are, without the slightest doubt, the two biggest rivals in today's mobile market. This is exactly the reason why various comparisons of photos from these devices appear in the world and when we already have them at hand Galaxy S6 etc iPhone 6, we decided to do our own blind camera test on these phones. At the outset, I would like to mention the hardware specifications - Samsung Galaxy The S6 has a camera with a resolution of 16 megapixels, an aperture f/1.9 and optical image stabilization in the basic equipment. In contrast iPhone 6 has a half-resolution camera, but with 1.5µ pixels and an aperture f/2.2. Only the larger model has optical image stabilization iPhone 6 Plus.
As I said in the introduction, we want the camera comparison to be fair, not influenced by the name of the phone, and therefore you can only see the photos themselves, from which the metadata has been removed. So you can only compare the photos from Zariadenia 1 and Zariadenia 2 . Which photos do you think look better? Express your opinion in the comments. We will publish the evaluation of this photo duel on Sunday.
Square
2
The top photo is always a little brighter and maybe even a little better, I think these are photos from the S6. The bottom photo from the iP6 may have slightly better and more realistic colors.
Well, now it depends if HDR was enabled or not :-) if not, I would say that Ip6 is 1 and S6 is 2 ... the photo of the watch is from the game ... it focuses on a different part of each ...
2 for each iPhone se I'll turn on HDR.
1 Samsung, 2 iPhone according to the reflection in the watch :D
1 iPhone
1 Copysung, 2 iPhone 6
I don't know what is from what, but the photos from 1 are much more natural... I think the photos from 2 have an overshot contrast and the drawing is lost in the dark parts.
But at first glance, the photos from 2 seem more pleasing to the layman.
The first is of course closer to reality. The second bets more on contrast.
place:
1: samsung, 2: iphone 6
iphone has more beautiful colors of the road and the sky, galaxy s6 has better building and tree details
appearance:
1 Samsung – I would choose it for a more detailed photo, although 2/iphone 6 has a more beautiful sky
Lego:
1 samsung – more beautiful and detailed, iphone 6 has more true colors
panorama:
although the 6 makes beautiful panoramas, I will give priority here galaxy s6 for truer colors and more details – you can see from the cloudiness and overall lighting that the aperture f1/9 from Galaxy The S6 creates a beautiful panorama on the 1st,
it's just that the S6 leads the way, I believe iPhone The 6S catches up with it with a better or the same aperture,
the aperture does enough in low light, the S6 also has 16 megapixels, which can be seen on the brick building on the panorama, it is beautifully detailed, I would like to know what the light transmission of the S6 is, because it seems to me that it is significantly better than the iPhone 6
sensor size iphone 6: 1/3″, but I don't know the size of the sensor Galaxy S6, because it has really good light transmission and detailed photos
1. Jamtung
2. Apple Iphone
square: This is the only pair where the second picture works better for me.
It's a pity that the photo of the watch is not focused on the same spot. It would also be worth mentioning the photo at night, or in poor lighting conditions.
1 for me.
2 has a lot of contrast, details disappear in darker areas.
Photo 1 more exposed, but less drawn, cool white, more pleasing colors, panorama much more jagged.
Photo 2 more drawn, but harder shadows, warmer white, the watch out of focus (it was probably taken on the first try, so worse focus) the panorama is smoother.
I'd rather take the #2 mobile camera, but the #1 has those nice soft shadows
maybe it will be possible to increase it, until then these minithe photos say it all...
What drew you to Rač? :D
According to the panorama it is 1) iPhone, 2) Samsung. iPhone somehow it doesn't know how to connect the image well, which can be seen in the telephone cable and the double tree on the right. The detail of the rear window heating is terrible in 2, but in both I am struck by the fragmented transition of the hood to the rear window...
The first ones are better, drawing, presentation of natural colors, etc.
Better for me 1
It's hard to compare since we can't see the real rendering of colors and both phones are very similar at first glance.
Square: 1
Outlook: I can't decide
Legos: 1
Watches: 1
Panorama: 1
1
The second seems to me to be just overburnt and poorly focused on the watch (maybe it couldn't have been better...)
1
Position 1 better
Position 2 iPhone
1: Much better drawing of photos, but lacks contrast, sometimes overlit, due to details and unburnt minds, it can be adjusted with a program..
2: At first glance, better contrast, better colors, but loss of details in dark areas and sometimes more overburnt bright areas, depth of field is worse.
I would take number 1, the contrast can be adjusted with software to the level of photos 2.
1. in my opinion, Samsung is more saturated, it is also Samsung's... with the watch, you can see more of the blurred background thanks to the lower clone- I don't like Samsung, but I think that this camera succeeded, especially the aperture.. but Samsung never made, I don't know, bad cameras in mobile phones :)
2. iPhone I think you will determine more realistic colors more beautiful sky... and panoramas on iPhone nothing compares :)
But according to the photos, it can't be compared very much, I would like a comparison in low light conditions or in the vicinity of strong light (due to burnout)
I have to say that both phones have a great camera, but I still don't want Samsung.. #iosjeios :) :)
1
Voiz: I live in Ráchi :D