Close ad

Quite honestly, I have to say that sometimes it absolutely blows my mind when I find out what people are willing to believe. For example, the percentages in the weather on iPhone In recent weeks and months, more and more people have interpreted it as an indication of how much of a given area will rain, snow, be stormy or anything else at a given hour or day, with which percentages can be linked. However, this is of course complete nonsense and with this article I would like to clarify this issue once and for all.

When I was looking for sources for this text, I somehow understood why some people believe the claims about the percentage of damage to a given area. On the pages Applu you will not find any literal information about what percentages mean anywhere, although I honestly think it is only because he somehow believes that this is a completely clear matter. After all, on his website he himself explains percentages "between the lines" in words about "precipitation probability", which logically cannot be expressed in any other way than percentages (or rather, some number that expresses how likely the occurrence of a given phenomenon is). Moreover, expressing the probability of precipitation in percentages is a completely standard method that you can find practically everywhere, in contrast, you would search in vain for the percentage of precipitation in a certain area. And if you wanted to Apple to issue in this direction, it would be foolish to think that he would not inform about it on his website, when it was a completely new approach to the interpretation of predictions.

probability of precipitation

There are many more arguments why it is absolutely nonsense to think that percentages in the weather show the area that a phenomenon will affect in a given area. Another one is that if even 10% appears somewhere, it ultimately means that the given phenomenon will happen. 100% probability, even if only in 10% of the given area. And predicting that it will definitely rain in 10% of Prague, while the rest of the city will be dry is, logically, much more complicated than saying that there is 10% of rain in the entire territory of Prague.ancand for rain. Apple and by extension no other operator of weather forecasting applications will take the risk of not being right with their forecast when they have the opportunity to show a more general but significantly more realistic model. In addition, think about how complicated forecasting models or weather forecasting applications would have to calculate the percentage of rain in a certain area. After all, every city is "shaped" differently, and therefore, when using this system, applications and models would probably have to calculate directly with cadastral maps so that their predictions are at least somewhat beneficial for people. For example, if only a radius of a few hundred meters in which the village was located, and it was narrow but long, the models could predict rain a few hundred meters from the village somewhere in the forest. And that doesn't really matter to anyone.

In a way, when I was looking for information for this article, I was also struck by the fact that when I tried to google where the statement about the percentage of rainfall in a given area actually came from, I was unsuccessful, because practically on all at least somewhat relevant sites you will read that the percentage of weather are equal to the probability of the occurrence of the given phenomenon in general. Therefore, I attribute this whole interpretation more and more to a complete misunderstanding of the text on one of the first links that jump out at you in Google when searching for similar questions. Specifically, we are talking about an article from iDnes on the topic "Occasional showers. But where? Or how to understand the dictionary of meteorologists?", in which you can find information on what the phrases "in the whole territory", "in most of the territory", "rarely" and "without occurrence" mean in percentage terms. How can something like this be misinterpreted, you ask? Simply. Someone probably simply took this information, did not understand that it refers to the entire Czech Republic (in other words, to any other country) and began to "graft" it onto much smaller territorial units, which is complete stupidity, because these phrases are not "built on" ". Moreover, in meteorology, the phrases "on most of the territory", "occasionally" and so on are used to describe the impact of the territory, not percentages. So it is complete nonsense if he went in that direction Apple upstream and instead of "in most areas" was saying 70 percent or more in its Weather app and meant the same thing.

So, as you can see for yourself, disproving complete nonsense is not difficult at all - you just need to think a little and, if you have time, browse the Internet a little. So, the next time you see similar craziness on TikTok, Instagram, YouTube or other places, don't believe them, because it's just spreading lies by people who are either trying to get followers, or simply don't know how to think critically.

smartmockups lbkjmj27

Today's most read

.