Litigation between AppleIt's been a really long time with Qualcomm and probably it will be like that for a while. Last week we informed you that Apple In this case, he lost his secret weapon – key witness Arjuman Siva, who worked for him in the past. The technology giant claimed in court that he was the one who invented one of the patents at issue – specifically, the speed of reconnection to the Internet after a device reboot. If this claim is confirmed, Appwould have managed to deal a hard blow to Qualcomm and at least partially win the dispute in his favor. However, Siva's lawyer advised him not to testify in court. So, it seemed that he would not testify and would only do so if the court wanted to summon him. But a few days have passed and everything is different.
You might be interested in
Siva is beautiful.onec decided to testify in court after all. According to a CNET report, he said that while he contributed some ideas to the patent, he does not consider himself the inventor of the technology in any way. He also added that he was very surprised when Qualcomm filed for Apple lawsuit in this matter. "Those were times that I remember fondly and look back on fondly. I was the kid who dropped out of college two and a half years ago. That's when I thought I had accomplished a really big thing.” said Siva, now a Google employee, in court.
Qualcomm modem chips should be available in this year's iPhonewho searched in vain:
Gallery
Bill Lin, expert witness Applu, after Siva's testimony, argued that although the former engineer does not consider himself the inventor of the patent, given his participation in the project, he should be listed as the inventor. How the court dealt with the former engineer's testimony Applu loads, is in the stars. We will have to wait for the verdict for some time. Qualcomm is trying to prove that Apple infringed his three patents and is seeking damages of $1,41 for each iPhonewhich infringes any of the patents.
I.e. Apple he is a demonstrable liar and cheat. When their fabrication was disproved by their main key witness :) He probably refused the money they wanted to put in his pocket for this service.