If you are a fan of Japanese accessory manufacturer Satechi, you will surely be pleased with the following lines. A few dozen hours ago, Satechi introduced a new triple MagSafe charger for iPhones, AirPods and Apple Watch and how different from the classic miniminimalist design that is inherent to its products.
The charger offers a total power of 15W, with 7,5W handled by the MagSafe charging pad, 2,5W by the magnetic dock pro Apple Watch and 5W then area for AirPods or AirPods Pro. During its production, steel was used in combination with aluminum, which gives the charger a luxurious feel and will not be a disgrace practically anywhere. What is quite interesting is that the magnetic charging dock pro Apple Watch It is detachable and can therefore be used as a classic charger that can be connected to any USB-C portThe only thing you need to keep in mind when purchasing is that you also need to purchase a 20W power adapter - it is not included in the package.
As for the price of the charger, it is not exactly low - after all, as with practically all Satechi accessories. The manufacturer charges $119,99 for it, i.e. about CZK 2760 without tax and other fees. However, it is necessary to take into account the fact that this is a premium product - in terms of materials.
ProDo you delete comments?
So it's not much. Belkin has the classic MagSafe 15W on iPhone and then Watch 2,5W and 5W flat for anything – types iPhone or headphones.
And it looks nice.
ProThe problem is that the author mistakenly mentions Magsafe. In fact, it's not Magsafe, just regular Qi with a magnet. I wrote it this morning and they deleted it.
Dobrý den Jane. We didn't delete anything from you and I don't see any of your comments in spam either. Anyway, to what you write - manufacturers like MagSafe really do label every charger that can be used with it. iPhone magnetically attach it. That it will then charge with lower watts is another matter. But there's probably not much point in talking about whether or not it's a good idea to call it MagSafe.
I have a printscreen of the comments, so you have malware in your system. The manufacturer named this product 3-IN-1 MAGNETIC WIRELESS CHARGING STAND. There is no Magsafe, it's really just Qi with Magnet.
But I'm not writing that Satechi doesn't name it MagSafe, but that manufacturers generally name it that way and that's why there's no point in using words.
I would expect precision from a specialized website. What you see is your impression. Magsafe accessories when connected to a phoneonem will trigger the Magsafe animation. Satechi doesn't do it, it can't charge more than 7,5W, so it's not Magsafe. For example, Belkin does it, that's why it's called Magsafe. You won't get away with it by taking my word for it. You'd better fix the mistakes in the first two sentences. The Japanese and especially Alza, as the payer of the article, will not be happy. I am sending proof to Belkin news, where we have my "up to 15 W". Now get on with me, because I am a layman, right?
https://www.belkin.com/us/boost-charge-pro-3-in-1-wireless-charging-pad-with-magsafe/p/wiz016ttbk/
No, I'm going to go at you now rather because you are unable to accept an opinion other than your own. Third and last - accessory manufacturers use MagSafe in large labeling for all magnetic chargers for iPhone 12 and 13, regardless of whether they charge 7,5W or 15W (kudos to the Satechi-type exceptions). That this designation is not entirely ideal is another matter. However, users already know these chargers under the name "MagSafe" and that is why they are still labeled as such, even here. But the article also says that the magnetic puck only charges 7,5W instead of 15W like the classic MagSafe, so I don't really know why you still need to try to teach us here and point out a typo in one letter (in addition, in an independent article paid for by Alza it is not, but we only refer to it as a Satechi accessories dealer). And this is the end of the answers, out of thousands of readers who have read the article, you are the only one who has a problem with the MagSafe label. Have a nice weekend.
I am rewriting this morning's comment:
I believe the article is inaccurate and should be corrected (including typos). ProThe duct is interesting, but it is definitely not Magsafe. The magnet is not equal to Magsafe. The manufacturer itself does not even communicate this. The phone is charged only with the Qi standard, but Apple i.e. 7,5 W. If the charger used Magsafe, it would go to 15 W or a few W less. In the linked video, it is nice to see that the phone does not display the Magsafe animation wheel after being attached.
Do you know when the charger will be sold here?