Apple this month tooneApple has officially introduced the long-awaited computers with ARM processors M1. The performance and capabilities of Apple processors are a grateful object of interest and the subject of a number of tests, benchmarks and trials. As for the graphics performance of the M1 processor, according to the latest findings, it leads the graphics performance of theonem series of desktop GPUs, and easily outperforms the performance of the Nvidia GeForce GTX 1050 Ti GPU or the AMD Radeon RX 560. This is evidenced by the latest benchmark results, which were highlighted by the Tom's Hardware server.
You might be interested in
Gallery
Company Apple In connection with its new M1 processors, among other things, it states that its eight-core GPU offers a computing performance of 2,6 TFLOPS, which is the same value achieved by the Radeon RX 560 GPU, for example, and slightly lower than what the GeForce 1650 can boast (in its case, it is a computing performance of 2,9 TFLOPS). The GFXBench benchmark was run under the Metal API from Applu, and during its course it turned out that the M1 processor often outperformed the Nvidia GeForce GTX 1050 Ti and AMD Radeon RX 560. However, a GeForce GTX 1650 benchmark under Metal is still missing. In the Aztec Ruins Normal Tier test, the GeForce GTX 1050 Ti achieved 159 FPS, while the M1 from App203,6 FPS. Pro However, to be completely objective, it is necessary to add that the GFX Bench 5.0 ser test is usually primarily used for testing smart mobile devices, and both the GeForce GTX 1050 Ti and the Radeon RX 560 are older GPUs. On the other hand, it is true that the M1 processor is equipped with integrated graphics, so the fact that it is able to outperform - albeit older - 75W desktop graphics cards is quite impressive. You can see the comparison tables in the photo gallery of this article, other tests will certainly not be long in coming.
- You can buy new Macs with M1 for example at Alge, Mobil Pohotovosti or u iStores
You might be interested in
It's a shame he left me in the spring. MacBook Pro 15 from 2013. I would have waited another 1-2 years. But we'll see, if necessary, MB will go Pro 16 sell quite well.
You're just lying, the old MB is almost unsaleable with the arrival of the M1 chip. See the new video of Peter Mary 😄
I agree. I probably have a new one unopened. Air 2020 (i5, 16GB, 512GB) with a starting price of 43.419 CZK and no one wants it even for 29.990 CZK :-(
Maybe I would buy it for 14K, you still deduct it from the accounting :D
SRY, but Mara only does video and photos and SoC, RISC, CISC, x86, emulation, etc.
It's a shame that the bootcamp is over, through which the performance could be tested in games.
But go, with theonem "AMD Radeon RX 560" is a few years old, so the bottom line is, brutal graphics performance is not happening! Just marketing for íOsly!
Advice – Hello, I have MB Pro 2018 with touch bar, i5, 256GB, 8GB Ram. I only use it for kancI do construction work and travel a lot. Does it make sense to sell it and go to Airand M1 8GB RAM, 256GB?
Thanks for the opinion
Not if you don't want to wait a little longer with ARM...
To the pureancThere probably won't be a big difference in terms of performance, although faster application launch will be nice. However, what could be useful when traveling is the battery life and the absence of a fan, so Air will be completely silent.
Well, I have MS on M1 right now. Office the problem is that it starts in 20 seconds.
The crap doesn't start in 20 seconds. It's only the first start because MS Office must compile under Rosetta 2 the following startup is already fast.
And as soon as MS delivers a new version with support for M1 it will be faster to use than on Intel.
For me, I would wait for the next version because they haven't come to the surface of the error yet and it's quite a shame to throw money into an old design, you'd better wait for a completely new piece
like yeah, a nice iPad with a keyboard and the benchmark can handle anything.
Then it comes to work and suddenly where is the performance of ARM? :D
Traditionally smart as a radio. Do you have any evidence for this nonsense, or are you just digging around?
Work? Ok, so for example video rendering there is a brutal increase compared to MacBook Pro 16 – and compare it to, for example, MacBook Pro 13 or Air That's completely different.
Ditto Lightroom or Affinity.
Then it's time to work and suddenly the performance of ARM is in the applications used ;)
I can already see how you compile x86 code there :D, or you work with some external HW or you let some calculations run for 24 hours :)
Are you kidding me?
Brutal graphics performance comparable to RX 560? so collapsible with AMD graphics from 2017?
Here is a comparison of that RX 560 with today's common NVidia Quadro T2000, which can be put in a Thinkpad P53
https://technical.city/en/video/Radeon-RX-560-vs-Quadro-T2000-Max-Q
There is no miracle on nvidia, it is already 167 in zebrack.
Here the RX 560 is from 276 in zebra.
Brutal performance my ass…
A regular thinkpad p53 for 60 thousand...
Something like a regular 13″ MB PRO 16GB and 2TB for 70k!
Or MBA 16/1TB for 50K
The regular p53 starts at 44K and has 16GB of RAM and a 512GB SSD, the MBA 13″ is the same 16K with 512GB and a 44GB SSD.