Comparing an almost 12-year-old device to the latest generation iPhone might sound ridiculous, but this example perfectly shows how fast technology is evolving. In its time, the Apple phone represented a kind of milestone that changed the smartphone market beyond recognition and started a new era that, in a way, continues to this day. For this reason, it's sometimes not bad to remember how the devices of the time would hold up against the latest pieces.
Gallery
If we were to mention the iPhone 11 camera tests, you would probably imagine competitors in the form Galaxy Samsung's Note 10, Google's Pixel 3, or any other modern phone. But this time, we're comparing it to the original Apple phone.onem, who came face to face with iPhonem 11 Pro Max. Pro For the purposes of the test, YouTuber iJustine chose the premium model, which measured its strength against its predecessor both in daylight and at night. The night mode also played a role, with which Apple boasted about keynote conference and claimed that this was a hypothetical turning point. TooneAfter all, the alpha and omega of the latest iPhone is the camera, which in the case of premium models even includes a triple lens.
You might be interested in
Considering its age, it is worth mentioning that the original Apple phone did not perform badly at all. It held up more than well in daylight, but at night it lost, mainly in terms of lighting and insufficient rendering. There is also some blurriness in the image and the resolution is too low, which is compared to iPhonem 11 spoils the overall impression. Nevertheless, its predecessor performs above expectations and would still be useful to ordinary users in an emergency. However, technology has advanced and few people would compare the quality of pictures taken with the original Apple phone.onem satisfied. All that remains is to wait, with what Apple will come next and what the photos will look like in another 12 years, for example. What is certain is that the race in the number of megapixels is definitely not over and we have a lot to look forward to in the future.
Am I the only one who thinks the photos from the first iPhone look better, more natural? :-D I was expecting some brutal split and look, it's not bad at all. And let's be honest, most of the photos end up on some site where it's a total no-brainer...
Do you mean the burnt sky?
I actually hate the HDR stuff. ProI was expecting more horror from my first iPhone. Sometimes I feel like there are some greenish, overexposed horrors coming out of that little thing... :)
No one will be watching the sky in those photos. There is a much more remarkable object. 😉
Well, you're not. I also expected a worse difference. I rather find the first ones more natural than from the new iPhone.
This is exactly what I was thinking too. The old ones are much more natural.
did the first iP already have focus or just fix-focus?
Attempting a joke? Of course FF!
I asked seriously. I started with iPhones only from the 4s and I don't have an overview of older models
@Dovi: OK, no problem :)
specs = https://www.gsmarena.com/apple_iphone-1827.php
Hehe, iJustine 😄
I also like the photos from the original iPhone more natural in terms of color. And the girl in photo No. 9 looks like she's in an advertisement for a slimming product - chubby vs. elongated.
well, I'm not a photo amateur or anything like that, so the photos don't matter much if I can't enlarge them, but from the original you get the feeling that it's the way it is (so more natural) because it's so tinted artificially I'm not interested in clouds and nonsense in the distance, only the object being photographed. In general, I hate modern hdr and it makes me sick when I see pictures like that, they are oversaturated for nothing. It's not pretty, it's just the color that catches the eye when flipping through the pages. That is, they did not lure me to the latest model with these articles.
Also a pretty good test by the same author :)
https://youtu.be/gLrue6_Dajs
Pixel 3a (hw same as XL except display + battery) = 399€ (..and even less on sale, so of course only in Rajch ;)
iX
Are you going to put the Pixel ad that no one buys into the discussion under every article?
Unfortunately, we won't buy it. Bad luck.
Mistake my friend, I posted this here for the first time in relation to both the author and iP 11 Pro and the second and last time under the article dedicated to the merits of the matter, i.e. Night Mode. It means being a priori blindly unbiased and following not only the herd, but the essence of the matter itself. Everyone can gossip, few can think ;)
Otherwise, here is another very interesting reason to watch the Android competition:
https://www.gsmarena.com/xiaomi_mi_mix_alpha_108mp_camera-news-39299.php
27/108Mpx 1,6μm/Qpx i.e., among other things, 8x lossless zoom, that was not here yet.
Honestly, if it weren't for the increasingly active, unfortunately especially Chinese, Android packs, the Krkouns from Cupertino would be innovating much less and much more slowly...
I've never seen a pixel in person in my life. But no one around me has one at all...
No wonder, Pixels are not officially sold in the Czech Republic yet (just like iPhones used to be ;). Proso far, they are only devices for hobbyists and connoisseurs in our country. Try to occasionally go to a large store like CZC or Alza (etc.), where they may have them in the showroom and sell them at a hefty markup. Or in Germany to MediaMarkt or Saturn, where both A-grade and full-fat versions are commonly available. You will not be the only one to see that the pure Androš in the latest version has its charm and is in many ways fully comparable to iOSem and in many ways it even surpasses it (let's not talk about maps ;). It just takes a little time and open-mindedness. As a long-term user of both systems, I know very well what I'm talking about. On the other hand, there's no point in talking about the design, there were Pixels, there are and unfortunately there will be half of them even with the fourth one (although this year they will be together with iPhoneThey are definitely not far off and God knows who primarily copied from whom ;)
For 2Mpx fix focus I think QUITE GOOD :)
The 2 portraits are even definitely MORE VIVID than this year's, not only compared to the first design pasquil...
Apple and others are just trying to delay the moment that occurred in the PC sector in 2004, when there was no longer a need for more performance and space. The stagnation of performance needs since iPhone 7, better display (the last real jump in iPhone 4. The camera was the last thing that was driven to the point of being 3-lens. Here is a clear reason for Ivo's departure. There is not much room for improvement in the field of mobile phones. Nobody wants or needs 1000 dpi etc. anymore. Services Apple They're off to a good start, but we don't know when they'll be able to start up, even if they generate a profit for iPhone and ensure further growth. Iwatch is a small salvation, where it can continue to advance for another 4 years. MacBook will be replaced by iPads. In order to create an even longer rotation of one cycle, but there is no real need, just an attempt to provoke a new motivation for change, but it is not about new technologies. It is not a mistake. But for example I have iPad mini 2 and I have absolutely no reason to replace it. Everything works for me there. Even after pance performance and application support. And this is 2013. Hold on miniabout 7-8 hours. I would like to buy a new one, but the new one can't do anything anymore. The iTouch is not worth 10 to me, when everything else works :(
No one is forcing you to buy a new one. I also drive the device to death quite a bit, but then it's nice when I buy something new that you can tell the difference. And the camera itself is really getting better with each generation. I have 4s, 6,7, Xs to compare and the differences are simply there. The test in the article comparing photos with a resolution of 300×120 points does not say anything.
Well, as far as I'm concerned. I'm AppI'll stay if I have to. Apple I have been using the products since 1993: :) Now I sold 8 and have XS for 21, the extra payment for the new one cost me 11000, that is my real contribution Applu, what am I going to give them. Nothing more. Yes, development has stalled, unfortunately or fortunately? And the hunt for a "better" photographer? Where do 90% of all photos end up? On insta! Or do you seriously want to convince me that someone actually edits those photos from a mobile phone in PS? When I open all those great photos from a mobile phone in PS on a professional Eizu for 50 liters, I want to cry or it really doesn't matter if I take photos with a mobile phone at 5000 or 40. The result is still shitty. But when I go through snapseed and look at it on my mobile phone, 100% With brightness and oversaturated colors, everything will be beautiful with Samsung's default OLED settings. With the lifespan of a current Insta story of several hours, it really doesn't matter...
I don't really care where 90% of the photos end up. I watch mine on a 4K TV with a diagonal of 1,6 meters…..
@Dovi: And from what primary source? If Xs, then not only ZRNO will please your ass on that large area ;)
2Dovi. On TV, everything gets lost in that imperfection. There is no difference between a mobile phone for 5000 and 40000 Kc. Everything looks perfect on the TV except for the photos from the mobile phone for 1500 kc. :)