Yesterday was a day of celebration for the launch of the long-awaited, extremely powerful iMac ProIn the shadow of this space-gray beauty, who Apple priced at an incredible 410 thousand in the highest configuration, however, the apple company also confirmed another very interesting fact to us, which indicates that iMac Pro as the most powerful computer since AppIt doesn't take long to warm up.
You might be interested in
Apple yesterday released in addition to the iMac Pro press release, in which he focuses on his new product. Of course, there would be nothing so strange about that. However, if you read it to the endonec, you will learn that Apple is already actually working on a new version of Mac Pro. It should be according to the words Applu designed for professional customers who need a high-performance system in a modular, upgradeable design, as well as a high-end display.
At this point, we don't know what the new one will be like. Mac Pro look like or when we will see it, but this information is still great news. First, it confirms that in laboratories AppAnother computer giant is building a new display that will be the embodiment of perfection. The new display is what many Apple users have been calling for for quite some time. Since Apple withdrew its display from sale, because many of them did not find one that fully met their requirements. However, this will of course change with the arrival of the new generation. And the promise of that Apple It will focus on professional customers who need a high-performance system, but it holds great promise for the future. It is very likely that we will see a Mac that will surpass the performance of the previous generation.onem iMac Pro at least partially obscured.
This is how he imagines the upcoming Mac Pro 2 Curved.de magazine:
Gallery
An update is needed
However, we cannot be surprised that Apple to upgrade your Mac Pro decided. It had been four long years since the last update, which is an incredibly long time in the world of technology. But even then, there was no Apple completely satisfied with your product. Craig Federighi for example, he admitted at the time that the shape of the “trash can” that made Mac Pro you can easily recognize it, it has a limited thermal capacity and therefore does not allow some more demanding work procedures due to the risk of overheating. It was more or less clear from these words that Apple in the following years, he will work on redesigning the design and will try to push his machine a good bit further.
Despite a few indications from the past weeks or years, it is definitely not customary for Apple Apple announced its products long in advance. However, the Apple company probably succumbed to public pressure, which began to criticize it for almost losing its focus on professional users. Reaction in the form of the iMac Pro and the upcoming Mac Pro, which would refute these speculations, did not take long to arrive.
You might be interested in
So let's be surprised when the new Mac Pro we will see what the offer is. Very likely it Apple will be presented next year. What componeHowever, we do not dare to guess what it will actually look like. However, if Apple its performance will increase even more, will it even be usable by a normal mortal, even a professional one?
Another concept Mac Pro 2:
Gallery
It will be a cry and wonder because of the price...
will not, since it will be built from desktop components (no mobile miniaturized shit) and without an LCD panel. Mac will offerPro higher performance at a better price than iMacPro, which is questionable for professional use (in my opinion, unusable).
And given that the best professional processors are currently AMD with EPYC (Intel is also expected in the professional Xeon class), the price could also fall lower.
Anyway, both old PowerMacs and new Macs Pro (except 2013) have always had a longer service life than their competitors. It is not talked about much, but Apple You always paid extra for something that wasn't done elsewhere. For example, an old Mac from 2009 has the same PCIe throughput as a 5-year-old X99 chipset. Prothat's a lot of Macs Pro "upgraded" to a better CPU (allegedly incompatible) is still a lifeline in editing rooms. A machine with the same performance on Wintel today costs over 60 sticks (and Apple 100 sticks), but don't buy it :-)
mac pro is the most affordable of the family apple. they should just allow graphics upgrades and offer support for nvidia too. between us, she Pro Vega is about equal to 1080 and it's not a hell of a chip for rendering some super large scenes... If I were to imagine a super professional machine, I would see two slots for dedicated cards and 10 PCIe slots, similar to what some gaming laptops have, because Thunderbolt 3 has "only 40GB/s", which is enough for now, but if you're buying a PC with a view to 3-4 years... keep in mind that today the target customers have a machine on their desk with two outdated GPUs and only TB2 available... And in 3 years they will have a machine on their desk that has two outdated GPUs and only TB3.
And of course, a lot of people will say that's the reason to build a PC, but I argue that mac proIt's software, not hardware...
And the man is an expert, he will probably recognize that right away.
Nvidia support has been around for a long time. It's called the webdriver (still updated) and includes OpenGL driver from nvidia for Quadro cards. On the contrary, AMD does not have its own drivery for Mac and relies on those directly in macOS (10.11Pro and GTX 780ti + R9 270X (bootscreen).
Otherwise, I somehow didn't understand what 10 PCIe slots mean in a laptop? Do you know what PCIe means?
ProSo, find out something on the internet about PCIe, not only slots but mainly about this protocol, so that you don't write such nonsense. And while you're at it, find out something about DMI and QPI. So that MacPro could handle 10 PCIe slots at full 64GB/s (for all), it would have to be powered by 4x AMD EPYC (at some 600-750W TDP just for the pros). According to your statement, this is how single-processor gaming laptops with a full TDP of up to 150W can do it. Isn't that strange?
First of all, you have to admit that Apple he completely gave up on professionals and focused on consumer electronics in the form of iPhones, which are sold in short order. He also gave up on professional solutions in the form of servers and left it to the competition, which is a shame.
Apple he coughed up the pros mainly because of the support. Apple support is bordering on arroganceancand rejection (Xserve, PowerMac G5). Apple was always more for "the people" and the PowerMac G3/4/5 and PRO series were just Jobs' vanity to prove that Apple can do more than the competition (DELL, HP, IBM).
This created a meaningless, Mac Pro 2013 jobsIt was a dud (more focused on family and friends) and the marketing was again aimed at ordinary people who were buying iPads en masse, iphone a macbooky.
But now Apple found that many professionals don't want (buy) 2013 even if they can afford it. They still go with dual-processor Macs Pro "incompatible" and happily upgraded to 2x 3,46 GHz six-core, 128 GB RAM and M.2 SSD RAIDs in PCIe. And when these machines are no longer enough for them, they solve the "Hackintosh" from dual-processor Dell and HP workstations. And we are talking about more than 5 million users. Even if the new MacPro bought half, it's more money in total than from the division iPhone 8.