Apple not only introduced a new iPhone, also introduced the world's first 64-bit phone. The new chip Apple A7 offers compared to the previous one Apple A6 used in iPhone 5 times the graphics and computing power. Apple iPhone The 5S officially becomes the first smartphoneonem in the world with 64-bit architecture, which until now was the privilege of only computers. Operating system iOS 7 was designed to take full advantage of the A7 chip, and animations or other effects on it were truly smooth.
Apple In addition, the A7 supports OpenGL ES 3.0, thanks to which both itself Apple says, developers have the ability to bring to displays iPhone 5S brings graphics and visual effects that have only been seen on Macs, PCs, or game consoles. Textures and shadows, sunlight reflecting off water, imaginary worlds in games, all of which are Apppossible thanks Apple A7 and its OpenGL ES 3.0 support to bring from PCs and consoles to mobile phone displays iPhone 5S. All applications in iOS 7 are optimized for chip utilization Apple A7. A great example is the application Camera, i.e. a camera that, thanks to the processor, Apple The A7 can focus up to twice as fast as the iPhone 5S. Proemperor Apple A7 is according to AppIt is also incredibly energy efficient.
Information from Applu so they sound really beautiful and progress has certainly taken place and it is truly revolutionary, not just evolutionary, the problem is that not even the full power of the processor Apple A6 in iPhone 5, almost no applications and games can fully utilize it, and developers, who are still forced to optimize their creations for older devices in order to ensure sales, have so far only brought a very limited number of games and applications that can utilize it. iPhone 5S to the fullest. In addition, it is necessary to take into account the fact that iPhone 5 has been on the market for a year, so the question is when we will actually see other applications that will utilize its potential Apple A7, we already have one, it is presented by Infinity Blade III, which will be available at the time of launch iPhone 5S for sale. If we also encounter the term energy-efficient again, and more than Apple A6, it's unbelievable that Apple did not dramatically increase battery life.
The only thing it offers in terms of battery life iPhone 5S vs. iPhone 5 more is the endurance in stand-by mode, where iPhone 5 lasted 225 hours and iPhone The 5S can handle 250 hours, but that's probably not what a user who buys such a powerful smartphone would want.one too much interest. On the contrary, when using things like surfing the Internet on 3G, LTE, Wi-Fi or watching movies or playing videos, which are data that Apple indicates battery life, we will encounter exactly the same values as for iPhone 5. So the question is whether people would rather choose a slightly less powerful processor that would still be able to satisfy their battery life requirements.
- iPhone 5S: the secret of the new coprocessor Apple M7 that measures your movement and saves energy at the same time
- iPhone 5S: the secret of the new camera that carries the legacy of Steve Jobs
- Apple introduced a new iPhone 5S with fingerprint sensor Touch ID
I am used to it.oneI am extremely satisfied with my iP5 and it is exactly as you describe. RomanYes, I would rather (easily 2x) last longer with comparable experienceonem. But I'll go for the iPhone 5s anyway :)
anyway, it's really a revolution in mobile phones, and I think it's a good choice from an investment point of view. Surely there will be no need to change HW for a few more years..
potapec - HW does not need to be changed at all, the OS runs on it, it's always a matter of some SW (mainly demanding applications) increasing the demands on HW every moment (so that it runs smoothly without breaking into the details) and so it will be year after year
twothones.. I didn't think it was an opportunity to change the i5 for an i5S.. I meant like investments in new HW that will last for a few more years, even in view of SW development as the 64-bit platform is just starting.. and it's a good step in terms of the entire ecosystem Apple NB,TAB,PHONE,AIR, APPLETV.. in my opinion, 64bit will be available on all HW (of course in NB it is a long time ago..).
Is there withancand that if they gradually deploy 64-bit in all devices, there will be development IOS, OSX and appwith simpler and faster..
Do you already know what GPU is used? Because smartphones have had Open GL 3.0 support for some time, it is difficult to tell which GPU was used.
I'm curious about Anadtech's tests, so how much more powerful is the 64-bit A7 than the Snapdragon 800.
It will probably be difficult to match a 32 and 64 bit system.. and the performance of the entire system does not directly depend on the performance of the processor.
"A great example is the application Camera, i.e. a camera that, thanks to the processor, Apple The A7 can focus up to twice as fast as the iPhone 5S". UF
That corrector would really suit you. :-) it's still full circle. Of course, we know what it's about, but unfortunately it's just "in plain sight". And you are "the media".
People wouldn't be satisfied. If you look at the discussion about the fight between iOvecka and aOvecka, I argue for Android by saying that the processor is like what is in the low end. 90% of people look at the parameters and in most cases we lose to Samsung, that both phones are equally fast, or vice versa iphone sometimes even if he wins, no one cares, only the parameters. Just like people chase megapixels in a camera, even if it's realistic maxI have 12mbps. Recently a friend laughed at me that I have overpriced macbook pro and that he has a great Acer something. He's not smiling anymore today. My 5 year old Mac practically destroyed his pride and not long ago we managed to roll laptops on the stairs. Mine only had a few scratchesancwith his cracked display and destroyed disk, he prefers not to talk about time. But no one sees the hidden bonuses apple
Did you think? RomanYou should put a "report an error in the article" button under the article because not only are the proofreaders here annoying you... but in my opinion, others are too. No offense to the debater-proofreaders... but it's stupid to throw several posts here because of typos. I just think this doesn't belong in the discussion. I admit that I've written something here too sometimes... but I apologize for that because it was a headline :) sorry in advance... if it affected anyone
In my opinion, this Samsung won't survive the moment, because I believe that Android does not support 64-bit processors.
But that's just my guess
64 bit does not mean twice the performance of 32 bit processors. Actually, it means nothing at all in terms of performance. It's just marketing. I'm in vain considering an application for iPhonewhich requires a 64-bit processor.
It's like when the manufacturer argued that the speed coefficient of the tires is up to 600 km/h, while the car is driving maxat least 190 km/h.
parmon: Surely it will make some sense...why would it Apple poured money into the development of a 64-bit 2-core processor. Apple was always different...and only the future will tell us if 64bit will be of any use. I read somewhere...that converting an application from 32bit to 64bit for iOS should literally only take the developers a couple of hours...or so. But it would be nice if someone looked into it in depth...why Apple I did that and switched to 64bit. And I'm also curious if the processor will show up on the new one. iPad mini?
diver: "He's here withancand that if they gradually deploy 64-bit in all devices, there will be development IOS, OSX and app"easier and faster.."
Believe me, the developer doesn't really care how many bits the target computer has. It's just a translator thing. It won't be faster or easier.
potapec - in that case I agree :) 64-bit procak in mobile won't really change right away :)
Grafix: As a developer, I can stand by the fact that it's marketing. "Remaking" is not difficult, it's a question of the compiler. But usability is 0. Believe me. And if you're talking about the future, then maybe in 10 years, when mobile phones will have 8GB RAM. But those will be different machines. This is simply marketing, nothing more, nothing less. Accept it. It's something like when Samsung comes out with a 4-core processor. Effective use of multiple cores is a matter of the OS and specific software, and believe me, no one will perform optimization. ProIt's not worth it.
The development of 64-bit processors was not an American discovery. These processors have been around for quite some time, including on the ARM architecture. ProToday, palaces are designed just like houses. Prois based on verified component (patterns) and is optimized if necessary.
that Zabak... the difference is that a 32-bit processor cannot work with a 64-bit compilation, but on the contrary, yes - a 64-bit processor can process a 32-bit program.
The difference between the Android community and Apple is precisely OS fragmentation.. if more than 90% of users u Apple it uses the latest OS with Android it's just the opposite..
All I wanted to say is that as soon as the 64 bit platform (iPhne, Tablets, Apple TV.. ) will make it easier to maintain 32/64bit applications.
I completely understand the issue of compiling programs and their development, as my first computer (I still have it, by the way) is from 1984... and I still program. But I remember the fall of one of the leaders of the computer market, who used RISC architecture 16/32bit as sufficient for users and did not want to change anything until the market buried him :-)
If analysts Applu are not complete fools, you have to believe that even 64bit has its place on the market..
that Zabak... the difference is that a 32-bit processor cannot work with a 64-bit compilation, but on the contrary, yes - a 64-bit processor can process a 32-bit program.
The difference between the Android community and Apple is precisely OS fragmentation.. if more than 90% of users u Apple it uses the latest OS with Android it's just the opposite..
All I wanted to say is that as soon as the 64 bit platform (iPhne, Tablets, Apple TV.. ) will make it easier to maintain 32/64bit applications.
I completely understand the issue of compiling programs and their development, as my first computer (I still have it, by the way) is from 1984... and I still program. But I remember the fall of one of the leaders of the computer market, who used RISC architecture 16/32bit and considered it sufficient for users and did not want to change anything until the market buried him :-)
If analysts Applu are not complete fools, you have to believe that even 64bit has its place on the market..
The A7 processor is 2-core, did I understand correctly?
Yes.. it contains a GPU and an M7 coprocessor..
64bit is a prerequisite for 4GB of RAM. Let's consider that today 2GB of RAM is already a common thing in high-end. If I want to double it, without a 64-bit system, more than 3,6 GB of RAM will not work. A similar situation was years ago on PC.
@iFlyCZ Support 64 bit processor; for Android is planned for 2014, including 4GB RAM, coz Apple mit will not be at that time. (Unless they cram it into an iPad)
http://www.androidauthority.com/64-bit-processors-4gb-memory-coming-2014-267402/
diver: XCode It automatically generates binaries for both 32 and 64 bits and the programmer does not have to worry about how many bits the OS has.
Transition IOS on 64 bits has no impact on application maintenance and development.