As early as 2002, Jonathan Ive, the company's chief designer Apple got to iPad concepts. According to him, the first prototype was created sometime between 2002 and 2004. In an interview for the server networkworld.com the famous designer literally says: "My first memory of the iPad is very vague, but I would guess sometime between 2002 and 2004. We were making models of what later became the iPad, so we were designing the tablet and researching it." The company's first tablet Apple therefore began to be projected eight years before we could meet it on the market. So it is likely that even today in the workshops Apple engineers are working on products that will be introduced in 2020 and possibly beyond.
Server & Hosting Buzzfeed today published photos of one of the first iPad prototypes, which they compare in photos with the 2nd generation iPad. Compared to today's iPad, the first prototype is many times thicker and its diagonal is 12″, today's iPads have a diagonal of 9,7″. It is not known what resolution the company's first tablet had Apple to offer to its users, however, given the 4:3 aspect ratio, it is possible that the resolution was below 1024×768, more likely somewhere around 800×600 pixels. Prothis type is very similar to the computer that was at that time Apple sold as a student laptop, that is Apple iBook.
Gallery
It's probably just a shame they didn't stick with the design without home button.
If you look back at what tablets were like in 2002-2004, this prototype was years ahead of them, and I hate keeping it a secret for so long apple :-)
I don't know about you :), but I really like the prototype from 2002, in my opinion it's more beautiful than the iPad that we know today, I don't know if it's better... :)
That thickness is quite similar to the first one iPhone from 2007, it's nice though :)
And it almost looks like it has speakers around the perimeter of the display... :-)
I think that it is worth paying attention to how the cooling is solved. It's definitely a tablet with a PowerPC/x86 processor.
Cooling/vents in the hem are then exactly the same solution as now Microsoft demonstrated on Surface in x86 processor.
Just an example of that Apple is really many years ahead :-D :-).
Ahttp://www.mojandroid.sk/novinky/sud-rozhodol-apple-must-publicly-admit-that-samsung-is-not-copying-ipad
Write an article about this, not just what you like
Anyone who remembers the last book about SJ will confirm that the iPad was in development far before iPhone and SJ suddenly completely jammed it almost overnight to quickly throw himself at iPhonebecause there was a real risk that something similar, like iPhone, the competition will come out and SJ was afraid of that like hell. They were quite far with the iPad, but for a few years it completely froze at the expense of iPhone.
Roman Oh, I already found it, and how do you determine which report belongs to the report (the title article) and which one to the side?
Ego picks it up apple sheep and there are an awful lot of articles built like that apple it's the most perfect, the most beautiful, the best, and with many articles, it points out exactly what and when something has changed, the name appWell, throw it all the way so that it doesn't get dirty somehow apple and don't say it's not... And you don't have to tell me it's not long ago you used to tell me cheerfully
I called the news section because it is definitely not read by as many people as the main articles and it is basically thrown away there
I would like 12″ and even more 20″ as a substitute for a table nicely fitted into a table with the possibility of tilting.
I see it in the comments, that's enough proof for me... you don't have to be bitter, I just said my opinion and I think I'm right
espio: don't bother, and if it bothers you, do the following: create an android websiteultrato write about successes on it apple. if it is noteurobis, you will do what you needlessly criticize. this website has an owner, you are not the one who decides what and where will be written on his property.
you can have your own opinion, but no one is obliged to listen to it, but you don't have to worry, it won't change you, you just have to accept that you can't get what you want, and that's why you have to do what you ask others to do. then you will understand that even a bitter person like you who tells you what to do only interferes with your decisions.
I don't believe you are flexible enough to satisfy a filutov like you. no one can do that. you are just a troll who comes to the web dealing with something you don't like and you ask him to present things in an intolerant tone or do things with your hateful attitude. turn your gaze to yourself and try to enthusiastically think about Apple, but you can't do it, so don't force others to do what you probably can't do yourself.
and we'll all be in peace, let this site do what it sees fit and if you don't like it, don't act like a jerk where I clearly don't need your opinion. there are places and websites where you can be friends with their owners with your opinion and ideas, and you can organize trebars green mass with robots there :-)
You're the only one who hates those trolls and idiots, because you're the one who reads the inflated inflated bubbles that are fans like you, of course you like what your brain is inflamed.. For you, my contributions are not there, but for me they are objective, and I want that objectivity, and everyone should get it, and don't read only what the owner of the proposal suggests to you, I'm comparing you to those trolls and idiots yourself (which you certainly won't understand even if you look at yourself) another thing is that no one told you to read my posts, so the fact that I'm annoying is gone and it's been proven again by those idiots here, the other thing is that I'm the owner, I didn't do anything wrong, I just asked him how he determines which report goes where (I answered nodockal) and the fact that I have an opinion on the matter like yours does not mean that I am stupid and a troll
Espio: well, first of all, it's unauthorized and Apple will definitely appeal, I think enough for a novelty.
Second, it was decided in the Council of State that Samsung was copying the design of the device Apple, if you can't see it, I recommend visiting an ophthalmologist. We can argue to what extent and what it copies, but Samsung is just so obvious that it's not normal.
However, to this British judge - if patent disputes are going to be decided based on whether the judge thinks a device is "cool" enough, I want to see where it ends... ProWell, this judge just said that Samsung tablets are characterized by not being cool enough (not so cool in the original) or by having unusual details on the back, and therefore Samsung is not copying, because the tablets Apple they are cool AND Apple should he apologize to them? Absurd.
Thirdly, I also don't like some things on this website, but that's why I don't accuse anyone of being apple a sheep, that because of his ego he doesn't write articles about what he doesn't think is important, etc. If you learn to behave decently, others will respect you.