When Apple introduced the world to the first one about two weeks ago MacBooky Pro and Macy's mini with M1 chips, many Apple fans were surprised that they did not replace even the top configurations from Intel, but “only” its basic versions. With similar steps from the side AppHowever, we will probably continue to meet in the coming months, since at least according to a very accurate leakerand @L0vetodream intends to say goodbye to Intel processors slowly rather than quickly.
You might be interested in
Apple although he left it at the presentation of the processors Apple Silicon It is said that he wants to completely switch to them for his Macs within two years, but he did not reveal whether he will always switch to them for the entire line, or whether we will see lines with a combination of processors from Intel and Applu. Second variaHowever, it seems that with the arrival of the first Macs with Apple Siliconwith new information from leakerand more likely to be discovered. L0vetodream claims that the Californian giant plans to introduce next year MacBooky Pro with a new design, which will continue to be equipped with Intel processors supplemented by those from Applu. In other words, this means that minialmost at the line MacBook Pro will pass Apple completely on Apple Silicon at the earliest in 2022.
Gallery
A prudent transition Applu's results are not too surprising. Although its chips offer much higher performance, lower energy consumption, and support for iOS applications, for some apple lovers it may not be an ideal choice, at least at first, and that is why it is Apple It also keeps the years-proven Intel machines in its offer. They will probably disappear from it only when everyone is 100% confident that this step can be taken without any restrictions.
- Newly introduced Apple You can buy products for example at Alge, Mobil Pohotovosti or u iStores
If the moron gang would rather give 100x better AMD as an alternative, only that they would charge a 3x higher fee for the CPU than it actually costs in other NTBs..
Everyone wants Thermalthrotling amd but not normal people :D
Thermalthrotling is probably Intel not amd
Otherwise, in the case of such talk, I would also like to see the link to some link
I have proof of the last test on the notebookchceck HP elitebook 830 g7 where it clearly takes advantage of amd and, as a bonus, it has better graphics and two extra cores in the CPU
Thermal throttling is only Apple and no one else.
Thermal throttling is a last resort protection of the processor against destruction, if, for example, someone starts the computer without a cooler installed.
In a normal decent computer, the CPU must never get into thermal throttling state, the TDP is clearly defined and the cooling must be adequately dimensioned.
That's it Apple do*yts connect the buckle on the phase and zero to save one cable of the middle working...
Intel never again. I have an M1 and I am extremely satisfied...
Agree, I'm excited too, Air with the M1 it flies like a rocket.
Exactly. KoneIt doesn't really make a noise like Temelín did with the previous ones. MacBookat…
Gentlemen, I have to agree, I enjoy it too. Nice piece of HW.
Yesterday I started air M1 16gb ram and my sled fell off. Last year's 16" for i9 is for sale.
For the use of macOS and its applications, it is ideal and better than AMD, because it will be able to do it Apple to do as he pleases, he won't have to wait, as in the case of Intel, for an unreliable supplier who will cut mountains of mines and deliver only garbage, outdated, uneconomical, and leaky processors. Ryzen are now the top, in a year they may not be, this way they will have it in their own hands, they can add their own functionalities directly to the processor core and do not have to resort to cat-dog solutions such as Intel Core + T2 chip. This is how it is when we talk about macOS. The ones they needed for work Windows they are (perhaps only for now, perhaps forever) out of luck, they have to endure the outdated Intel version or switch to the competition. Even if Microsoft added the controllers Windows 10 ARM for Apple Silicon, x86 64-bit apps won't run on it and I doubt anyone would buy it MacBook, to be able to use the environment Windowsu, so to everyone so far Windows they installed on the mac, it was mainly those applications.
I want to buy in the next two years Macbook PRO 16″ and desktop MAC. Of course, assuming they don't have an Intel processor.
It is interesting to look at the comparison with PCs, Intel is already making the 11th generation of processors and than Apple will do 16” PRO and iMac with M1X will already do 12. Generation and dedicated graphics will also take a step forward. The M1 Macs compare to their predecessors with low-end 8th and 10th generation Intels with integrated graphics. But I admit, in apple in the world it's like a step forward 4 years. Hopefully this is the final software purge along with the end of 32-bit applications.
Look, the Intel 11th generation is not miraculously better. Yes, there is progress in graphics, but there is no problem there. The M1 even tears apart the MBP16 i9 with dedicated graphics. And it's still the M1. The first generation and in the cheapest variantach. Once they add another 4 powerful cores, as is probably planned in the M1X, it will also knock out a lot of desktop CPUs. Intel is at Apple totally out of the game. And why spend money on AMD? It's better to work on Rosetta or some other emulation and just emulate the few things that can't be rewritten for ARM. I personally study computer science and we really only do things for Widle. So I'm quite worried about buying Macbook with the M1 chip, but when I see the tests, like Máry's or Březina's, I simply won't spend the money on Intel and I'd rather risk something not working and maybe buy some plastic Aušus for things that won't work under M1 and finish those few semesters with it. I still want to make software primarily on Mac and iOS and that's what the new Macy's are great for.
I wouldn't say it beats the 16", it's faster in some ways, not in others. We're still comparing Intel's 9th generation with the latest Apple Siliconem... However, the price difference is still clear :-D Nice tables are created for software compatibility: https://t.co/xgIzpdgzU0?amp=1
Apple mainly wants to leave x86. By switching from Intel to AMD, he wouldn't help himself much.
Apple He mainly wants to earn more. ProNo, because those guys are such a blast. Prono to feed AMD. Hey, nothing against it, I've always supported them, but AMD hasn't always been a great company and it's not written anywhere that in a few years they won't pull the shorter konec rope. Moreover, if you now take the MBA M1 in the basic configuration for 30k, then you can't build anything with Widlema for the same money. Personally, I'll buy it tomorrow on Black Friday Apple I will order MBA with M1, 16GB RAM and 512GB disk. With a discount for university students of less than 42 thousand. I'm a little nervous that I won't be able to do it, but it will be solved somehow. Intel by no means.