New smartphones usually have a very decent battery life for a few months after purchase. However, this gets worse over time, partly because the batteries in them are slowly destroyed by constant charging, reducing their capacity. This is especially true inoneThis means that your phone may last a few hours less on a single charge than it did initially. However, this problem could be fixed in the near future.onec.
Gallery
University of California, Irvine student Mye Le Thai pulled off a truly groundbreaking feat. In 2016, she figured out how to make batteries that maxThe minimum capacity is almost not reduced due to charging. While conventional batteries survive only a few thousand charging cycles, and their quality naturally decreases rapidly with increasing number of cycles, batteries using the student's technology can reportedly last up to 200 thousand charging cycles. Purely theoretically, it could last at least 400 years of operation, according to initial estimates. And just imagine, Apple states on its website that the classic battery used in the iPhone is designed to retain up to 500% of its original capacity after 80 full charge cycles. However, if you already reach about 80% of the capacity, the phone's lower endurance is really noticeable.
You might be interested in
The whole magic lies in ultrathin nanowires in the battery, which are used in batteries. The student "just" coated the gold nanowires, which are thinner than a human hair, with an electrolyte gel, which rapidly increased their lifespan. According to available information, their properties did not deteriorate at all in three months, during which the battery was subjected to 200 charging cycles.
You might be interested in
Although this technology is still in its infancy, many experts promise a bright future from it, which could significantly change a lot of electronics, led by laptops, tablets, smartphones and similar things. However, this revolution could also be reflected in the automotive industry, both in electric cars and in classic cars. Of course, everything is still in the early stages and we will have to wait a little longer for the sharp deployment of this invention. However, the promise for the future is undoubtedly huge.
She discovered it in 2016 and it's 2019... It must have fallen asleep somewhere.
Truth. X years ago, revolutionary batteries were already here and the truth escaped.
Prodevelopment doesn't take a week... Moreover, most of these battery concepts are presented in a completely insane way. Most articles always present these batteries as a finished product, when in fact it really isn't.
Well, first of all, there were no batteries!…. but they were only written about…. and secondly, technological development, laboratory tests and mass production are all completely different. Put your hand to the work and hopefully you won't slow it down.
Another author who is able to mess with the keyboard.
There have already been miraculous batteries on paper and in labs...
Almost nothing for this lifespanoneMoreover, they are certainly "very excited" about the whole battery industry ;)
The discovery was made in 2016, and after three years there is almost no mention of it anywhere.
This is just another fabrication where the lady is trying to make some money.ance.
If it were true, then after three years the leading manufacturers would already be capable
to introduce the production and sale of these new batteries.
What then Apple was he selling when he couldn't reduce performance for the sake of user experience? Only so animated 💩
Jiřík, why is it eating you up? Apple , one day you will also earn a little bit and be healthy. 😉
And what kind of a mental cripple are you? Maybe Jirka already iPhone He's had it for a long time or he doesn't want it. But it's none of your business. You better take care of yourself, make sure you're healthy, otherwise you'll just stay with it and die like an ignorant idiot.
Nothing against Applu, but the margin is about 70% ??.. As a result, if you buy an Android for 15000, you have a device that is more expensive (computerone(in the nt).
Just the price of iPhone storage can almost be called a scam.
Common sense therefore suggests not buying things that only globally increase the price of their competitors.
I agree with the gentleman above. I could have bought one too. iPhone but what for? For these ridiculous prices I got a Huawei P20 Pro for 12k excluding VAT. And I'm not talking about the memory size, camera, etc. I probably wouldn't go back, and I've been a long-time iPhone user and appoverall.
Company Apple, which installs targeted whores on the phone and is expensive as hell, disappointed me. When I buy an expensive thing that does not have the best parameters on the market, I expect that the processing and durability of the product will be worth it. Instead, the bastards sent out an update that reduced the phone's performance to unusable levels. Supposedly to save battery life - It worked. Lasts significantly longer. I don't use it.
Cool. The article about the miracle battery has not been here for a long time. :-) I've been reading articles about miracle batteries since 2010 :-)
Kamilian, the outings are over, go back to the pill department
bangs for you? so that makes sense to me
What do I read here, what is the opinion, who believes in it.
She must have been a Muslim woman enlightened by Allah!
An article about nothing... a few such revolutionary batteries always appear during the year and the reality? We see for ourselves…. So please write an article about batteries when it actually starts in the market…. The manufacturers want us to buy a new phone every two years and I think the battery is the main reason people change phones...
That woman has been alive for 400 years to claim such unverified bullshit?
I also have a good idea, let the manufacturer produce one size of battery, so that if my phone dies, then let me use that battery in another device/phone and I don't have to throw it away.
Exactly. Agreement.
An article about nothing
1. The "invention" was nothing more than nanofibers made of precious metals - that is, a technology long outlived.
2. The world is not worried about the number of cycles, but the capacity of the accumulators - nanofiber technology is outdated in this regard and it is a dead end to increase the capacity - that is why the patent did not catch on and will never be put into practice.
3. The design of the cell with precious metals is pointless - no one would pay for such accumulators.
4. This is an old and long-irrelevant message, I reckon that the author of the article was picking his nose and didn't know what to do, so he gave birth to this bullshit picked up from old articles from God knows where
every seller wants to have the greatest possible sales, and such a battery does not fit into their business
It is mainly about the fact that every invention must be put into practice (and the product on the market) at the right time. If they had come up with it now, by now, for example expensively developed (now obsolete) technologies, would not have paid off. It's like when a new super-powerful processor comes out, it's actually maybe 10 years old, because the old one has to be manufactured and paid for by now.
According to the Name it is 100% Vietnamese!
Good, high-quality inventions are plentiful! But there is no interest in putting them into practice - that's what multinational companies would do without their whores!
I will applaud when it happens and the battery will work for years. I used to have a Samsung phone. The battery lasted for over eight years. I had pencils that were probably charged thousands of times, and after four years they were thrown away.
When it comes to, as the classic said: buy cheap, sell expensive, and pay invoices late, nanofibers made of expensive metal do not work in a flashlight. And on top of that, it's about five years old research...
Well, there have already been such inventions, and Musk keeps putting prehistoric things into cars, huh???
So there is no revolution. Please correct the title of the article.
Otherwise, I've been following all the news related to electromobility and batteries for about a year. Over time, I set up a special folder for them, and to this day, 22 revolutionary and otherwise groundbreaking inventions are registered there.
A large part is promised to be put into practice within a few years. But some inventions are more than 15-15 years old..
Nice, but in koneconsequently impractical.
The manufacturer does not need to market a product with an "unlimited" lifespan (he would go bankrupt), REAL ecology is only a concern of a small percentage of people, profit or better equipment comes first, and technological development is of course connected to that, most modern electronics are two or three morally obsolete and unusable for years, most people simply want a better device after a while.
Personally, I'm a fan of these things, but...ancUnfortunately, I don't see any real application in this.
Let's not be naive. The technologies have long been discovered, but it is not in the business interest to present and use them. It is better to constantly make new devices with a shorter lifespan than a device that will last you a lifetime.
It is not in the interest of manufacturers (especially the leading ones) to produce immortal devices. If you don't know, technology is produced using components with a limited lifespan, which are designed in such a way that the manufacturer expects the device to reach the end of its warranty period and it will be necessary to buy a new one. Even if the manufacturer uses a battery with a lifespan of 400 years (and of course charges a decent price for it), you can be sure that other computers will be out of date in a few years.onenty and you will need to buy a new phone, which (wonderful) this battery will no longer fit. :)