As is customary, the intergenerational iPhone with the "s" designation traditionally brings with it improved performance while maintaining the same design. We should expect the same this year, since Apple with a high probability of presenting iPhone 6s with processor Apple A9 and possibly with 2 GB of RAM. Such a possibility was highlighted by the Taiwanese media, which reports that Apple could hide a more powerful memory module in the iPhone, thanks to which it should iPhone same RAM as iPad Air 2, which this year offered more powerful hardware than the iPhone – for the first time since the launch of the first iPad.
Moreover, speculation says that Apple it will use the faster and more economical LPDDR4 memory, which Samsung has already started producing, and they will also use it Apple to be supplied by current suppliers Hynix and Micron-Elpida. Elpida according to sources nestshe was preparing, but by now she should have improved her production enough to meet the requirements Applu for this year. The use of more efficient ones would also have a positive effect on the educationone, as the next generation iPhone will again be more powerful than the current one thanks to it. Of course, the processor also plays its part in this Apple A9, which could be triple-core exactly as the chip is now Apple A8X. This year is also the first time since 2010 that the iPad has outperformed the iPhone, which was also considered the benchmark iOS device. In 2010, the iPad was sold alongside the iPhone 4 until the launch iPhone 3GS and offered a chip Apple A4.
I'm sorry, but the 2 GB is really necessary. My iP6+ is seriously struggling with 1GB of RAM, web pages keep reloading, apps frequently close and reload. It's a spring. Sorry to say it, but they just didn't get it. And I don't know why they had to save those few cents in such a stupid place :(
With iPhones it is worth buying only eskov's advice trebars the six is completely useless if you own a 5s and if you have a bigger display and a microsecond better response compared to the 5s it is a waste of money out the window
I have 6+ and the loading speed just flies
I also have 6 plus 64 GB and everything works as it should, applications, games, internet. I think that the error will be somewhere in your device....
I also have a 6 plus and so far I'm completely satisfied :) especially in terms of battery life, it's incomparable compared to the 5S
The reloading of pages is a feature in Safari. When moving back, the page is also loaded macbooku. Even if nestacila RAM to store several pages, and swap to internal fast memory would be able to do it.
6 64, all is well. I would say that RAM is more needed on the iPad than on the iPad iPhone.
I personally think that page loading doesn't depend on the size of RAM. But I've been seeing this problem since the update to iOS 8 and on a Mac since Yosemite. And I tried it on my iP5s and on my wife's iP6 and in the store on a 6plus and on the new iPad air. In my opinion, this is a mistake in Safari. It happens on everything. And more RAM is useless, it would just unnecessarily increase battery consumption. Prothat's it Apple trying to put as little as possible into the iPhone. It's not that he wants to save a dollar on products. After all, competing phones have 3 or more GB of RAM and it's useless to them.
Well, RAM is never useful, the more the better.
jj..that's smart Apple invented. In 2 years when he comes iOS xx, so on iPhone 6 will be unusable and reasonable thanks to 1 GB of ram minimom will be iPhone 6S, although the price of a 2GB module is already negligible today.
Sometimes less is more. The iPad has 2 GB and they are useless there, at least for now. Safari It still loads like everything else. It still applies that the more RAM, the worse the battery usage. I have 16 GB of RAM on my Mac and that safari It's probably even worse there than on the iPhone. And I have 100 mb/s. The one who keeps wanting more RAM doesn't know what he's talking about. If the competition, Samsung, HTC, etc., put 20GB of RAM on them, they still won't run as well as they did with the 512MB RAM in the iPhone 4 that I still have on my desk today.
re; Rob75 it's sad that you have such an opinion, I could use much more memory than is offered. hmm
Rob75: in two years when the latest version comes out iOS on the iPhone 6 like a snail, so you will be on Apple cursing why the 2GB isn't there
XX and how would you like to iOS did it use more memory? I can understand it on OS X, the complexity of professional programs requires more and more RAM for a better result, but na iPhone?
When you have iPhone, everything works there and it works fine, and if by chance it doesn't work, it simply doesn't work and it's not because of the ram. The guys also write that the problem does not concern small frames, but errors in Safari and it doesn't matter how much you have, some people like it, some people don't, what does that mean (?) – error in Safari, or rather, misalignment..
iOS it works with memory very well, I would venture to say perhaps like no other system in the world.
I don't believe that if you had more ram you as a user would use it. Maybe over time it would be reflected in support or fluency, but computing power and debugging for the given HW also play a role there.
Say what you want about the divine optimization, but 2GB of ram wouldn't hurt.
Oh, and Rob75 couldn't hurt to practice a little grammar.