Although the imaging capabilities of displays that Apple has been using in its products for a long time at a very high level, the fact is that, at least in terms of refresh rate, many products have room for improvement. Apple in fact, it bets on only two options in its portfolio - specifically, fixed 60Hz or variable 120Hz, which it uses in Pro models of iPads, iPhones and MacBooks. However, as it seems now, we could at least partially say goodbye to 60Hz soon.
You could be interested in
After information began to spread in the previous weeks that Apple will switch from 17Hz displays to 60Hz panels next year for the base iPhone 120, offering users a smoother display of moving content, a reliable reporter Jason Snell said a few hours ago Apple now working on 90Hz displays for future iMacs, iPads Air or Studio Display. The positive thing is that we could see these displays perhaps as early as next year, as, for example, the iPad Air is expected to be used together with the M3 chip, which this model should receive next year.
Gallery
The increase in the refresh rate of the display in Apple's cheaper product line is very positive news even for professionals. Indeed, if Apple deployed at least a 90Hz display with an external Studio Display, it would practically mean 100% that the next generation Pro Display XDR will also see at least 90Hz, rather 120Hz.
Sad but true
I'm extremely curious what will happen to Apple when it's over craig federighi eddy cue I'm really interested to see if the whole company will go down even more or if I'll be stuck in place like they're doing now or new management will come and we'll see one more thing again
Air power car charger apple car projects are canceled non-profit vr headset replacement of connectors for usb-c in products like their change There is no step forward from them I am really curious what I will bring new people when I leave now It is not far away
Erm, but do you know that this is a professional display for work? I paid 150 kc for the xdr display and I don't regret a single crown. We can easily compare it with your 000hz display and believe me, you will be very sad :)
That I am so bold. Did you buy that XDR just because it's the best, or did it actually improve your work efficiency in some way? It's just that you write next to the article that you are not a professional photographer (and probably not a cameraman either), so I would honestly be interested in the benefits of XDR in other areas.
I am attracted by the higher resolution and design, money would not be a problem, but I would also like the smoother image. And ideally PC compatibility, because for rendering and working with AI I have a machine that I can't replace with a Mac yet. Here it is Apple unfortunately too self-absorbed. :/
I like it on the table and I like to look at the photos on the nice display, I enjoy taking photos, I have a Leica and it's nice there
Dhdhdn: I don't condone OLED TV, but it doesn't seem like the best choice as a work monitor. I'm just in the process of choosing and have already tried the 32″ 4K WOLED and QDOLED and had a problem with both. Those ppi that aren't 110 or 220 don't look good on Mac. The text is just goofy because the system doesn't handle UI scaling.
The displays themselves have a pretty poor brightness and I need to work with very bright windows, so it pulsates terribly. And I have a lot of static elements at work, so I'd go for a quick burn. And I'm not talking about the ills of those technologies. With one exception, QDOLEDs are as shiny as dog balls, they only get scratched with the wrong look, and the black on them turns purple during the day. Again, WOLED is too dull everywhere, so readability deteriorates.
Great as a monitor for gaming at night, but I wouldn't want it for work during the day yet.