If there's one thing I've been really excited about in recent years with iPhone cameras, it's the macro mode first added to the iPhone 13 Pro (Max) and 15x optical zoom on iPhone XNUMX Pro Max and this year tooneeven the smaller iPhone 16 Pro. However, while optical zoom will likely remain a privilege of the Pro series in the future, in the case of macro mode Apple this year, it "got it" and for the first time in history, it offers it natively on the basic iPhones 16 (Plus). For me personally, this is a great step, because taking macro photos is really fun and even if you don't take photos very often, when you return to macro from time to time, you are usually amazed at what you can see on objects in front of the lens thanks to this mode. And since I tested the macro mode as part of my review of the basic iPhones 16, below you will find a taste of what you can do in a few minutes in the autumn garden with this phone.oneI can take a picture.
Gallery
As you can see, flowers in particular usually come out really nice when taking macro photos. It is true that, for example, in a light wind, capturing a similar photo with at least some focus is quite a challenge, but if you have fast fingers, you can do quite a bit of magic. Of course, I don't mean to say that my photos are particularly great. This is really just an example of what you can "snap" thanks to the macro mode in a few minutes during your lunch break at home. For me, macro photography is iPhone really great fun because it offers you well-known things from a new perspective.
iPhone 16 (Plus) & 16 Pro (Max) can be purchased here
iPhone 16 (Pro) is most beneficial for Mobil Pohotovosti, where you get a 3-year warranty completely free of charge and you can buy it in installments without any increase.
So I don't want to say anything, but not much for me.. Even my 13pro can do this kind of trick and that's pretty miserable too..
I agree, but I don't think the phone would take pictures like that. I would like to put it in the hands of someone more experienced, and I don't mean that in a bad way.
Great. But the point of the article is that basic iPhones couldn't do it until this year, and this year they did.oneThey are really coping.
Everything would be OK, even those amateur blurry photos, but the title of the article, especially the "breathtaking" thing, is completely out of place.
Here, everyone is a world champion 😁 I think the photos are nice and I understand that she wants to use them to demonstrate the newness of the situation. iPhone konehe really knows how to do it. God, people, fuck off with the haters, the internet is full of them and there's really no need to bring it up here
Thanks for the comment. Let's leave the quality of the photos aside. It was clear to me that someone wouldn't like them, as always. I showed them to two people who are quite good at taking photos, and they were happy with them. But that doesn't matter, the main idea is, as you write, to show that the iP 16 koneIt really does macro and in good quality.
Positive, negative, supportive or other comments belong in every discussion 😃 You have to put up with that 😃 but you shouldn't be swayed by them 😃 It's good that people can express themselves in any way here, for example Mr. Lol would have already been BANned elsewhere for one word 😃 And if one were to expect only pleasant and positive comments, then one would be a bit naive and labeling everything as HATE what we don't like is also not good. I think that an intelligent person will make up his own mind anyway, regardless of other comments 😃👍
In my opinion, you are doing an excellent job and you write it as you see and feel it, anyway, if it is an article called photo test, this is how they take photos... etc. supplemented with photos and videos, then people will always evaluate the quality as well. If you limit yourself to the point of the article, then just a headline with a photo would be enough 😃, but I think that on the other hand, you are happy when other people also give their opinion.
iPhone In my opinion, the 16 takes very good macro photos, considering that you only took photos handheld, there could have been a gentle wind blowing when the object was in slight motion, the result is very, very good, and I dare say excellent!!! If people expect it to look like it was taken with a digital SLR on a tripod, they need to go to another website 😃 You have to appreciate how such a device can take photos and record videos, even if it's on another IPhone Last year's series even made a feature film with a budget of $75.
Definitely continue what you are doing and don't be discouraged. We will look forward to more independent photo tests and even if it costs you time, I believe that it is also your hobby and even if you read different opinions from us regarding the quality and comparison with another model, there will be more photo tests 😃👍 After all, there is always something to test, e.g. front photo, ultrawide, photo to raw, zoom or videos in different modes or to ProRes log 😃
It purrs like a cow