People directly involved in development Vision Pro, so called Apple Vision Products Group, believe that the headset will reach its ideal form in the next four generations. The information was brought by Mark Gurman, who has very good contacts directly in Applu. According to him, people from the team working on Vision Pro they feel there is still a lot of work to be done before the device can be considered sophisticated enough for customers to use every day.
You could be interested in
Although it is not clear what the developers Apple Vision Pro they consider it to be the ideal form of the device, but it is likely that they are currently gathering input from the first customers who are already encountering the first, not perhaps problems, but rather the shortcomings of the first generation, and they will try to work on their improvement in the next generations. Among the main shortcomings is, for example, the weight of the headset, which users complain about when using it for a long time. So it is obvious that Apple will focus on weight reduction. The battery is another drawback, because if you really want to use it Vision Pro full and, for example, filming with it, then it is possible to discharge it in 90 minutes.
Gallery
Another problem is the fact that the battery is not integrated into the device itself, but this seems to me to be unsolvable within four generations of products, but it is definitely something that will want Apple change in the future. It is also necessary to debug errors visionOS and also improve the performance of glasses in dim light or darkness. These are the things that will probably be addressed in the next four generations. Apple focus and of course also add some new features.
I see it the same way
Yes, the resolution of the AR space video also wants to be moved from ±720p...
Everything will depend primarily on the speed of SoC progress over the course of those eight or ten years, ideally to or even better below 0,5nm, i.e. 5A(ngstroms), i.e. if it will be technologically possible at all in mass production by then. production at least somewhat reasonable prices...
...and that's only if we don't run into difficult or almost unsolvable 'silicon' material / physical complications...
I highly recommend to everyone: https://www.tomshardware.com/news/imec-reveals-sub-1nm-transistor-roadmap-3d-stacked-cmos-20-plans
..even including the links in the article ;)