Although the presentation of the new iPhone 15 (Plus) took place only recently, the eyes of many Apple fans are slowly starting to focus on 2024 and thus on the iPhone 16. However, it seems that, unlike this year's basic model series, they will not cost much. While this year Apple for iPhones 15 (Plus) he pulled out with a modified frame design, Dynamic Islandor a significantly improved camera, next year's changes are expected to be more cosmetic and, what's more, some long-awaited ones will not even arrive. And this despite the fact that in 2024 there will be much greater pressure to deploy them.
iPhone 16 should look like this iPhone 15
When Apple two years ago it came to the iPhone 13 Pro (Max) with support ProMotion displays (i.e. with variawith a refresh rate ranging from 10 to 120Hz), Apple fans were convinced that it wouldn't take long for this new feature to arrive on the basic iPhones. However, the 14 series didn't bring it, the 15 didn't either, and now a reliable leaker yeux1122 came up with information that the 120Hz display refresh rate does not count Apple not even with the iPhone 16 (Plus). At the same time, he was already this year or last year Apple criticized for denying basic iPhones with a price tag of over 20 thousand crowns one of the already completely standard gadgets of Androids that are half or two thirds cheaper. However, it seems that he does not mind the criticism in this regard at all and ProMotion so you betteroneIt's more likely to be an exclusive for the Pro series than to please its fans and add it to the basic iPhones, which would actually "just" make up for the shortfall they've made behind cheaper Androids. So next year will be full of jokes in this regard.
- Apple products can be purchased for example at AlgeIn iStores whether Mobil Pohotovost
I remember it was supposed to come out on 12 Pro, there was already speculation at the time about promotion, the display could physically do it, butonec they didn't enable it with 12 pro yet, only with 13 pro. It's sad, I understand - although basic iPhone, but it still costs 24-35 thousand, and at least 90Hz, so to speak, could offer.
Am I the only one who is completely blown away by the refresh rate? It seems like the most useless parameter to me. When I switched from ip7 to ip13pro I couldn't tell the difference. However, with the ip13pro, scrolling in some applications "tears" more - that "dynamic scrolling commuting", when the finger is already gone and the content "commutes", so it jerks and I attribute the real thing to these monkeys with the refresh rate.
Probably bad optimization, nothing like that happens with Samsung.
It doesn't even work on the iP 14 PRO. It is possible that the 13 PRO will throw him for a while, for example, the 60 Hz, which is a good puzzle against 120 Hz if you try it. For me, the main function is for convenience and also the flashlight (I don't need it to draw a static image 60 times per second, which the mentioned iP7 did for example - the flashlight looked like that too).
You're not, I don't care about the refresh rate either. Actually I don't even see a difference, my monitor is currently 75 Hz, before I had 144 Hz and I don't see a difference. Recently a friend was showing me a Samsung with 120Hz and I can't see the difference compared to 60Hz. So it makes no sense to me.
If you can't see the 60 x 120 Hz difference, then it's really bad. Otherwise, this is me apple it dials in quite a bit, because I simply require an always on display and 120 Hz. And somehow, what almost every Chinese woman fulfills for a few bucks apple locked only for the PRO model, which is about 9k more expensive. It totally turns me on because we're at a time when he could apple to issue only one iPhone per year and give it the real 3 functions that PRO has in addition. But 4some reasons Apple decided to issue a heavily truncated basic iPhone without a display that is worthy of 2023 and then the significantly more expensive PRO, which has a few extra things, but essential things. I don't know anyone who bought the iP 15 PRO for any reason other than the display and/or the telephoto camera.
I don't know anyone who bought the iP 15 PRO for any reason other than the display and/or the telephoto camera. — You don't know many people like that :- ), in my area they have iPhone so 80% of people and honestly maybe 1 out of 10 don't know how many Hz the display is.
It's a similar opinion from the internet where there are representatives of people who want small phones. No, it's not true, there are quite a few of them.
Apple people are technically illiterate and would be happy with a 3 thousand dollar china if it was indistinguishable from the latest iPhone.
Well, that's exactly why. They tried ProMotion and remote photography and more. They don't want to lose their convenient use, so they bought PRO (the base doesn't have ProMotion, third camera (and possibly AODisplej?) I take PRO. That's the mindset of most people - statistics pretty brutally support it even in the last generation, where according to information from June it was in the order of 14 PRO MAX, 14 PRO, 14). Obviously, they solve this, because PRO models sell better than the basic ones. Sure, some people will simply buy the most expensive model because it is the most expensive. However, anyone who has tried a few of these things that are common among competitors, or has switched from Samsung, for example, does not want to get rid of those things, whether they are a company director, a teacher or a medical student ;)