If you follow the events in the technology world, you definitely know that CES 2023, one of the biggest technology events ever, is taking place right at the end of this year. At this conference, the biggest technology giants present their innovations and possibly offer some insight into the future. Traditionally, Intel also participates in CES, which is stilloneanciently fully supplied Applu their processors before the transition to Apple Silicon. Since then, when Intel was somehow not doing well, there has been a big shift in development and it can now be practically said that Intel has caught up with the competition. At the aforementioned CES event, Intel then presented, according to his words the most powerful processor for mobile devices.
You could be interested in
This allegedly most powerful processor for portable devices comes from the 13th generation of Intel processors and is called Core i9-13980HX and is the successor to the previous most powerful mobile processor Intel Core i9-12900HK. It boasts 24 cores, of which 8 are performance and 16 are energy-saving, 32 threads, maximal turbo-boost clock frequency up to 5.6 GHz and support for up to 128 GB of RAM. The previous most powerful mobile processor from Intel was narrowly defeated by Apple's M1 chip at the time Max and it really became the most powerful, however, it was subsequently crushed by the M1 chip after a few months UltraTherefore, it is necessary to take into account the age of other processors currently on the market – for example, Apple's M1 chips. Max and M1 Ultra, are more than a year old, or three quarters of a year old.
It could definitely happen that the latest Core i9-13980HX will actually become the most powerful mobile processor in the world for the time being – just wait for the performance tests. However, it is worth mentioning that we are expecting the introduction of new chips from Intel soon. Applu with the designation M2 Max a M2 Ultra, which will most likely "put the mentioned new chip from Intel in their pocket", so the scenario from last year will be repeated. In addition, it is also necessary to focus on the efficiency that is in the chips Apple Silicon simply unrivaled, due to the many times lower energy consumption. In this respect, therefore Apple it is constantly leading and will definitely continue to lead for a long time to come.
Intel PCs still have two problems. Windows and consumption. A few hundred points in some test is quite a smooch to me. I need the computer to have lightning fast response and I don't want to feel like I have a buzzing drone on my desk in front of me instead of a PC that is about to fly off somewhere when I start a more demanding application.
So the mac is the obvious choice for me.
What kind of PC gem from the nineties did he have at home? :D
He described it correctly, if a person doesn't have an ntb with a low voltage cpu, or a similar device, but there are full cpu's and a little more, it's still so noisy for every Intel and AMD. I have a one and a half year old machine for 100k, solved for cooling relatively well, but when it gets heavy, you just hear them.
What kind of PC gem from the nineties did he have at home? :D
What can I say, consumption is a big advantage applu and I say this as an intel/amd user. But it certainly wouldn't be possible to say that the amd CPU on the ntb limits me in any way. It would be enough if the ntb manufacturer gave me a proportionally large battery as it gives apple into macs and it lasts a long time too. Anyway, this jerking off is for max exonem at the cost of extreme consumption is stupid. Not that Intel can't make low-wattage CPUs, but for those few % in Cinebench they will easily increase consumption by 2x. For example, I still have an old i7 4770K on my desk, which is a 10-year-old processor today and any NTB can put it in their pocket. But even after all these years, the PC still works very quickly and there is no program that limits me.