Lawsuits and constant squabbles are nothing new in the gaming industry, on the contrary, they are a daily bread that most developers are already used to. In the case of Ubisoft, however, this is a relatively new situation that has surprised not only fans, but also other companies. Legendary gaming studio decided to sue Apple and Google for allegedly allowing the popular game Rainbow Six: Siege to be ripped off, the concept of which the developers used in the new mobile online shooter Area F2.
If you follow gaming news and are active in this scene, you have certainly not missed the enormously popular game Rainbow Six: Siege, which belongs to the Tom Clancy's saga.ancy. It was this one that Ubisoft managed to pack a lot of punch and it is no wonder that it has become one of the most played titles with a wide fan base. And it is at this point that the technological giants Apple and Google stumbled when they decided not tochat developers from Qookka Games to replicate the success of this shooter and use some of its concepts. Although both companies de facto only offer the game space for visibility and promotion, and did not participate directly in the development, Ubisoft decided to sue these companies instead of the original developers. The studio is allegedly mainly annoyed by the fact that neither of these giants was willing to remove the mobile game Area F2 from its store and cancel it.oneInstead, they went into the pockets of Applu and Google received substantial commissions, which stemmed from the great interest in the game and, above all, from the hefty microtransactions.
The struggle that probably lasted several years began in Los Angeles, where Ubisoft did notchat confirm the official complaint and lawsuit. On the other hand, it is not surprising, Rainbow Six: Siege is a gold mine for Ubisoft that will not dry up and the game is currently played by over 55 million players. The developers are primarily afraid that Area F2 will take over a significant percentage of their players and lure them not only to an almost identical user interface, but also similar maps and overall level design. The only question remains why Ubisoft targeted the lawsuit against the store operators and not the original developers from Quookka Games. The only conceivable reason could be that studio It falls directly under the gigantic Chinese corporation Alibaba, where enforcing international law would be much more difficult.
Proč targets Google and Apple and not on the developer? That's probably clear. He would not take anything extra from them and, as mentioned in the article, he would have to be tried in China