Apple computer Mac Pro It was released just a few days ago and has since been in the hands of many reviewers and bloggers around the world, who are testing its features and whether it is worth its high price. Of course, we haven't forgotten about the benchmarks and performance tests that pit the latest model against the competition. Tech enthusiasts have so far Mac Pro highly praised, but still found a few criticisms and flaws in the beauty. So far, however, it seems that Apple with a new Mac Pro hit the spot.
Gallery
Long awaited Mac Pro, which can now also be upgraded and its componenty, withoneIt was released. However, the first batch was especially enjoyed by reviewers who got their hands on the computer first, and ordinary users still have to wait a few days for delivery. It didn't take long for YouTubers like MKBHD, iJustine, and Jonathan Morrison to share their impressions, where they don't skimp on praise and highlight the Apple computer above the competition. The elegant and clean design, extremely quiet design, easy access to the computer, and the fact that it's easy to use were all positively evaluated.oneents and passive cooling, thanks to which the computer is almost silent even when in use. Everything is taken care of by the effective passage of air, for which the entire design was adapted. The only drawback is the dust that allegedly settles between the holes and it is necessary to wipe it regularly.
You might be interested in
The alpha and omega was also the performance, which was properly tested and blew everyone away. And it's no wonder, the computer includes a 28-core Intel Xeon, 1.5TB of RAM, two Radeon graphics cards in the most powerful configuration. Pro Vega II and up to 8TB SSD. The last mentioned disk can handle write speeds of up to 3TB and read speeds of 2.5TB, which is unimaginable for the average user. The performance isonec finally showed in the video rendering, which had reviewers in raptures. The computer processed a five-minute video clip in 8K resolution in 4 minutes and 20 seconds, while a standard machine would have taken several hours. As for the Cinebench benchmark, Mac Pro scored a solid 9918 points. As you can clearly see, apart from a few minor things, which unfortunately include the lack of USB-A ports on the back, this is an unbeatable device, which few people can afford due to the price. New Mac Pro but it is aimed primarily at professional filmmakers and demanding users who take advantage of the performance. By the way, see for yourself the enthusiastic impressions.
A PC alternative with Threadrippe 3970X and NVIDIA Quadro RTX6000 will blow this polished misery with burned-out intel to shreds. And for a machine that is supposed to be used for rendering, it is surprising that it does not have the best on the market. But let the users wait tens of seconds longer for the rendering to be completed for that money than they would have to for each video, their stupidity
So if I'm going to render something on a render farm, then the huge investment in this machine is probably useless, right? Just buy an Acer for eight thousand, prepare a video in the program and cloud they will send it for rendering. No need to spend over a mega for the same thing :D
I read somewhere that the Threadripper memory controller can "only" fit 128GB, Apple would have to reach for the server Epyc. And more RAM more Adidas, in PR clancIt looks better than 1,5TB of RAM. :) And the second thing is that this device will be for a narrow group of companies that will use software massively optimized for AVX-512 instructions. Otherwise, of course, I agree, AMD is the clear choice today. Pro Intel would be a loss today Appvery painful, that's why I think Apple Unfortunately, Intel and AMD do not have good conditions for their machines. Which personally bothers me quite a bit, Intel is now stagnant and I would personally like to buy a new Imac with AMD, but there is nothing to choose from. :(
PC Supermaster
I respect your comments and I have the feeling that as far as PCs for really professional work are concerned, you froze about 4-6 years ago. Stop embarrassing yourself and making a fool of yourself.
It was probably with that laptop for 8k exaggeration, but it is not possible to seriously perform more demanding operations on such a machine, you need to make videos. Even if the resources were in lowres and then the result was rendered on the farm. In other words, it would be a terrible ordeal, because the machine wouldn't even be able to handle the editing software itself. I personally tried it several times :D
This is far from always the case. A textbook example is the processing of dailies on set during filming, where you work with a large amount of data and need to process it really quickly and flawlessly. The more powerful the machine you have, the better, but it is not possible to carry more than a workstation, raid field, breakout boxes, UPS, reference monitor.
Make sure the people who buy it aren't stupid and poor retards like you and buy it together with the afterburner card.
However, it would be of no use to me, the games have different machines/graphics. I'm also talking about a really expensive alternative, but at the same time cheaper and noticeably more powerful. We are still somewhere in the hundreds of thousands. The point is that Apple blindly betting on Intel, which is currently fumbling around and just recycling old cores full of bugs and not getting to a manufacturing process at least for 10 micronsonech. AMD with Threadriper is simply much better suited for these things. It will be more fun when Apple with great fanfare, instead of the X64 architecture, they will deploy the ARM shoulder pads, then it will be really fun in Kocourkov
Although I am a fan of AMD, unfortunately it is not. TR supports only 1 TB of ram, and then there is specialized software where amd simply won't catch, for example, AVX-512.
Hi Fellaz, seriously, Mac Pro it is not a computer for playing games. Make peace with it. Editorial office AppleInsider (considered also an akysi contact point between himself Applom) received indignant emails in the last days of the launch, in the sense of what the company is about Apple allows data such prices per computer. AppleInsider issued a clear opinion: Understand that Mac Pro Requests are made by the largest animation and film studios in the world, application developers, scientists, engineers, e.g. NASA is interested in it, MiniMinistry of Defence, or various healthcare companies. Alone Apple stated that this computer is not intended for the general public, because you will not use its power for even 5 minutes. This is not a commercial PC with a powerful i9 processor, for playing games. From RAM memory (ECC Reg) to XEON W processors with such compensating memory in Mac Pro There is nothing wrong with that. Mac Pro is a brutal workstation that you can also find from other companies such as DELL, Lenovo, etc., for systems Windows or Linux, the price of which ranges in similar astronomical numbers. (you can also find sets for 250 thousand EUR) The entire interior of the Mac is specially designed and developed by engineers Appyou. MAC pro it may have a GPU that cannot be bought commercially, nor will any other system offer you the connection as it is imagined in the MPX module, how it works, etc. Similarly, he developed battery base plates Apple for your own Mac Pro, they also have other workstations (WIN, Linux) that are capable of handling 1.5 TB of RAM and cost between 1.500 and 2.000 EUR. That's why the base price is MAC Pro 6.000 dollars and is intended for a specific user. Pls everybody! Professional users know what the computer is about and all similar commercial conversions that you throw in the basket in Alga for your new PC are irrelevant. For basic things, you can buy an iMac or a more powerful laptop Pro, which I am already working on at ILM or at Pixar. As for RNDR, they are only done on a personal computer in the professional industry preview rendre. Everything is handled through farms, etc.
It also has a similar meaning. Pro Display XDR, which does not replace minitor Thunderbolt from earlier this decade. This gap is now being filled by third parties. The new display is a replacement for reference displays that are at similar prices – or much more expensive. See reference film SONY monitors (with better parameters) for EUR 30, etc.
I understand all that. It's not on CS: GO in 8K/768FPS, I was just referring to the deployment of a useless Intel processor. Instead of Apple he took the TOP off the market so (just like demented DELL, for example) he fights with Intel, head on and ignores AMD even though it offers a better solution in every conceivable aspect (more threads, higher performance, lower price, modern upt to date production process)
You really think it's only about what he wants Apple? Do you know how many people, companies, contracts, investors and what is most important - shareholders are behind it? How much money is involved in all this just to change suppliers, or completely change the brand of processors or GPUs? It must be understood that it is not about whether there is a faster ProCac or a more powerful GPU at a given moment. Every product from Applu are somehow set and limited by things that we don't even dream about, what is behind it all. Not everything is the most perfect, but it works, the company makes money and has the most loyal and satisfied customers in the world. Whether you like it or not. That's exactly what the much talked about ecosystem is about, what products from Appeven after 2 years, they still have sound and value, which cannot be said of other companies. who is talking about some old Android phone these daysone or a 4-year-old Samsung laptop? Apple can't just afford fads like flexible displays. Everything must be brutally planned and reliable. Even though, even the master carpenter cuts himself (vid AirPower fail) Commercial statements about how you can build a more powerful PC for that money are irrelevant, because the performance of the processor and GPU is not everything. What matters is how it works, how it's designed, and the speed and reliability will manifest in a completely different way than you think. And exactly those fools from professional animation and film studios know this. Even the absence of Nvidia on Macs is far from being a problem Applu. The whole dispute started sometime in 2009 when Nvidia refused to take responsibility for its defective products in macbookoh and some friendsonentami in Cinema Displays and especially the reluctance to modify the GPU for needs Applu, (Macbookand he is preparing iMacs) because otherwise it would not work. It didn't stop then AppI have nothing else but to turn to the competition (AMD), which opened due to their open policy Applu arm Recently, AMD has been working hard and plans to release GPUs within a year. And they are not bad, if you look at the professional forums of animation studios, etc., AMD is completely recommended due to their modification. Nvidia, which also closed its system, has now +/- focused on the gaming industry. The current absence of RayTracing in AMD cards is not that important because professional things and movie effects are still rendered via the CPU (Arnold, Mantra, VRay) AppI don't see her, neither do any of us... and believe me, it's not about shooting impressions and opinions off the table. The fact that many people do not understand why things are the way they are is completely normal. In any case Apple he is not obliged to explain his policy and reasons for doing so.
Does lqd pay you for it? Or do you give them an unpaid PR job?
Don't pay. But if that doesn't make sense to you, I apologize for wasting your time reading :)
Lqd you even if he sucks Apple fuck you, you will also defend that because it makes sense to you :D
I don't know, but I'll let you know when I get the hang of it...
You wrote it well, I guess you are a pro user too. It is interesting to watch how some certified experts react to your contribution. I still remember the times when the greatest experts on Mac were those who never worked on it :-) How many of the current critics have ever worked, or will have the opportunity to work in the future, on a machine like this? Mac Pro?
Geekbench obviously can't measure the real result, because, uh, not even 21000 points in multicore is somehow not much. :) That's how much I have on my Macmini. It's otherwise nice, that's true. Personally, I don't understand why it doesn't have exhaust fans? That way the air circulation doesn't work. Those Vega's are probably specially made for Apple and if I don't have active cooling, then put the bones. You'll be cooked in no time. And the biggest bummer is that the Macpro doesn't have dust filters. It will be inside the brothel! :) But it will definitely be fun Apple -Vacuum-cleaner for $3000. ;)
And another thing, can you install your own graphics cards?
This is geekbench 5, there is a drastic change in the results. Try to measure yourself in it mac mini and you will be surprised.
Well, I see it now. :) I have 982 single and 5092 multi.. :)