The comparison of the flagships of the Californian and South Korean giants continues. While in a recent speed test between iPhonem XS Max and Samsung Galaxy Note9 celebrated victory iPhone, this is not the case with the battery life test. At least according to the tests of the YouTubers from Phonewow.
You could be interested in
The testers subjected both flagships to an ingenious test in which smartphone operations were performed using robotic arms. Samsung Galaxy The Note9 is equipped with a 4000 mAh battery, which is about 20% more capacity than the iPhone XS battery. Max, which received 3174 mAh. Some people could be optimistic even with the unbalanced values on paper. After all, the chip Apple A12, which is found in all three new iPhonech, was manufactured using 7nm technology, which should make it extremely energy efficient. However, the opposite is true.
Thus Samsung Galaxy The Note9 looks like this:
The test itself consisted of common tasks that an average user might do during the day. These include phone calls, texting, playing games, browsing social networks or, for example, watching videos. All settings on the smartphoneonech was the same and the test was performed twice to confirm the result. iPhone XS Max The test always started well. During an hour-long phone call, it lost 3% of its battery, while the Note9 lost 5%. But in each subsequent operation iPhone XS Max was losing more and more. Then when the flagship AppThe battery was finally discharged, the Note9 still had 37% battery.
Although the flagship Applu did not completely fail the test, its battery capacity is more than enough for a full day of use. If you use the phone less intensively, you can easily get through two days.
What the hell is that? iPhone It will definitely not work if you say "If you use the phone less intensively, you can easily get two days out of it." As a result, the Note9 and iPhone XS Max in terms of battery life, there is almost no difference." I don't understand that, just write that I have a weak battery and that's it. You write as blindly as possible. When the tests are at speed a iphone it wins when exporting video in 4k, which "normally everyone exports", so you have a mouthful of how it crushed the competition, and at the same time, it's stupid for the average person.
I also didn't really understand that sentence, if the Note9 still had 37% battery and iPhone was already discharged, so it can't be said that the battery life is almost the same. If it had 5%, I wouldn't say so. I've only had iPhones for a few years, but I'm not a blind fanatic like the editors in LSAto say such nonsense. And lately I've been thinking about stopping watching them altogether, their level has gone down a lot.
Know this, if we look at it from the other side "if you use the Note 9 less" then I will also reach the 4 day limit. But they didn't think of that anymore :D
He won't get it, because he will start living his own life.
After all, it has a smaller battery capacity than the Note 9, so it is clear that it will not last longer.
Battery capacity is not the only quantity that determines endurance. Software or HW technology can be just as important.
Not even at that speed iphone It's not that good. https://youtu.be/Fc2RflSjfto
On iphone xs somehow doesn't stand out in anything except video and price, not only against Samsung. Overpriced misery, polished
If you unpack the Samsung from the box, a few days will still be fast :D
What can we say, it didn't even succeed in speed for the Huawei P20pro.. After launching several appek starts killing in the background even though it works without any problems with the competition..
As people have written here, iPhone it only excels in video quality and price, unfortunately. (although I wouldn't be so sure about video either - the pixel 3xl is similar)
It also seems to me based on the video (when I compare the intensity of the white color on both phones)onech) that the Note had the display brightness set to higher throughout the test and still won.