The AnandTech portal published a review of the new one a few days ago. iPhone XS, in which he takes a detailed look at the processor that beats in the bowels of this year's flagships from Applu. According to analysis from AnandTech, the A12 Bionic processor, which is part of the iPhone XS and XS Max, up to 40% more powerful than the A11 Bionic, which was part of last year's iPhone X.
This is what the new flagships from Applu – iPhone XS and XS Max:
Gallery
One of the most interesting pieces of information emerging from the analysis is that this year's A12 Bionic processor should be up to 40% more powerful than last year's. There wouldn't be anything so interesting about it if Apple he did not say anything completely different at his presentation. According to his words from the September keynote This year's processors are "only" 15% more powerful. Moreover, AnandTech compares the performance of the A12 Bionic to the performance of some desktop processors, which is truly impressive.
If we look at the GPU side, ie. graphics part of the processor, not so many innovations took place here. The new GPU in the A12 Bionic processor is rather only slightly improved from last year. But this does not mean that it is not efficient - quite the contrary. The GPU has greater performance mainly due to the addition of a fourth core and at the same time due to increased graphics memory. But the negative thing on the GPU side is the "throttling mechanism" that it should have Apple definitely reworked in the next generations. The point is that when the GPU is under heavy load for a long time, the phone starts to heat up considerably, which is not very pleasant. Apple therefore, it should focus on the GPU performance curve and "throttle" it during long-term high performance to avoid high heating, which is not ideal for the phone.
You could be interested in
In the review, AnandTech also took a look at the new iPhone's camera. According to them, the camera has received a really solid improvement in all aspects. The new sensor is able to absorb 50% more light while taking really high-quality and detailed photos. Smart HDR It also works perfectly and exactly as it should. Apple he described in his presentation.
XS yesterday
Why are the two first paragraphs almost the same?
To make the article longer….
: D: D
Is Andrei female or male? Or some popular transgender? You can't tell from the article.
It still has a power of about 300 mhz on a PC :-D So it doesn't matter
before you write anything, study the tests they perform like core i7 xxxx :D you have enough boy
and before you write something, study something about it, you asshole. He's right... the A12 mobile chip is a MOBILE CPU and is equivalent to a Pentium 4... only a complete ignoramus and an unartist can think that these are everything... they say in iphone is the cpu better than i7 processors… good gibberish from some blalist. oh well, today's kids :)
luul: it's not about the clocks but about the performance in the benchmark, those clocks first find the tests and then talk crap .. today I'm 33 years old and I've been moving around in IT for some time ..
It's clear that you've never held anything like this in your hand, otherwise you would speak differently.. all you have to do is sniff it. ipad pro and compare it to a notebook with a core i7 and you would feel it right away.. we compare the CPU not the GPU.. the benchmarks speak clearly!
blink here: http://static2.uk.businessinsider.com/image/59bfa20871fd8f1a008b4f7d-660/a11%20bionic%20benchmarks.jpg
One benchmark does not make spring, only a fool can write that it is more powerful than i7. In some respects, it can be as powerful as a mobile intel core processor (desktop PCs are somewhere else, they have singles for 10 thousand and multi in tens of thousands), but it will never be as universal - in many things it would fail tragically against intel core.
There are a lot of such processors and they are used, for example, in servers or for various applications where more or less only one thing is done, what makes intel top at the moment is its versatility and brutal performance on one core (the 10 thousand here as well).
I guess someone here didn't understand and started talking to mechat core i7 6xxx and above I was talking about the core i7 2-3xxx older versions of course I mainly wanted to say that the A12 definitely does not have the performance of a 300mhz srot pc or a pentium 4.. in any case it can be freely compared to a 4 year old CPU.. oh yeah and immediately cursing the idiot and bringing up today's version of the core i7 is completely pointless.. for comparison apple A10 is quite a bit more expensiveoneyou are like a 4 core Xenon X5xxx 8-10 years old.. we won't even talk about some Pentium 4
You wrote that it is faster than core i7 xxxx, which could be any generation, including the last one, so you are correct. :) Yes, it is probably faster than several generations old processor (especially from the era before Nehalem), it benefits from its architecture and is faster in specific operations, but any modern and dual-core will tear its ass in general load. Unfortunately, there is nowhere to test it, one of the few is 3dmark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics – A12 27558 points, mobile dual-core intel has 38243 points.
https://www.notebookcheck.net/6300U-vs-A12-Bionic_6967_10166.247596.0.html
Hello editor. I have been following this website for some Friday. But today I already thought that I would write like this in the comments so that others can see it.
Could you please stop crapping ads all over the place between articles??!! It's scary how many ads there are on the site. Gallery for viewing photos on the phone is also a disaster, it's a shame!
Do the job cleanly and elegantly as it is apple alone. I think I will not be alone in this opinion
vpn with adblock and you're good to go 😀🤟
Terrible liars in that Applol 😀
and when will you publish an article about new problems iphone ? it doesn't maintain the wifi signal for a long time and at the same time the regular signal also drops, sometimes it drops out completely. such errors are probably not significant for a phone for 40k :) you'd rather write as is iphone performance... you'd better cut the video with the benchmark comparison because there were two tests in the whole video, the second test iphone It didn't start because it was running out of battery and it didn't keep the application in the RAM like a pensioner has problems with urine retention. The battery drains faster than on iphone x etc.. etc. but it's forbidden to write about that here, I see.