Just two months ago, the world of technology and innovation was shaken by the case of a saboteur from the Tesla company. Apparently, a miscreant named Martin Tripp was supposed to make the smooth running of Tesla's Model 3 production impossible, and to make matters worse, he also took care of exposing company secrets to the public. However, the former employee does not hide his positive attitude and opinion that he acted correctly. According to his words, it was necessary for the public to learn about the unfair practices that the company applies. However, this claim gains even more weight as another witness emerges who describes a negative experience with Tesla as his employer.
You could be interested in
According to the mentioned Martin Tripp, Tesla is responsible for a whole series of complications with the Model 3, as it knowingly placed faulty batteries in its electric cars. This claim is joined by a former engineer named Christina Balan, who (according to her own claims) notified several times of faulty elements in the production. In its statement, it says that the company is trying to put employee complaints about production on the back burner. This covers security issues, quality tests and various other issues. To make matters worse, Christina was reportedly fired from the company because of her efforts to appeal these mistakes to higher-ups.
Tesla disagrees with such statements. According to several statements, their production complies with the standard procedure.
However, the mystery is why Christina is admitting such important information only now. He has not worked at the company for more than four years, which gives the conspirators a lot of basis for new theories. In addition to the mentioned problems, the former employee also comments on the topic of design. According to her, some of her colleagues focused on the shortcomings in this area, but they did not receive enough attention. This problem concerned the Model S, which had an unconventionally separated roof from the rest of the vehicle. Of course, design complaints cannot be compared with safety features that could cause serious complications in practice. We will see how this sharp case crystallizes and what position Tesla and himself will take Elon Musk, who is also not having the easiest time.
Does the author read it to himself?
1. with his positive attitude and opinion
2. concerns security issues
?
"The mystery is why he's confessing now?" – In every better company, the obligation of employment is contractually affectedancand to confidentiality after release for a pre-agreed period.