The Australian government has today proposed new legislation that would allow companies, including Applu, had to provide the relevant authorities with access to encrypted data. If the obligations arising from this law, Apple failed to comply, he faces a fine of up to 7.3 million US dollars and possibly prison terms for those responsible.
You could be interested in
Apple already provides access to encrypted data. However, it requires a court order and cannot be used to request messages or data from FaceTime. These features use end-to-end encryption. This means that only the sender and recipient can decrypt the data being sent. Although everything goes through servers Applu, but he doesn't have access to the encryption code and can't access anything that was sent via messages or FaceTime.
At the moment, however, it has Apple stále přístup do každého iCloudu. Ten je sice také šifrovaný, ale ne metodou end-to-end a společnost se tedy může dostat do jakékoliv zálohy iCloudHowever, after a dispute with the FBI Apple plánuje i iCloud provide the same protection. He wants to prevent himself from accessing these backups, which may contain a large amount of data.
You could be interested in
However, the Australian government does not take end-to-end encryption into account at all and assumes that the company from which it requests data will be able to comply. MiniThe head of law enforcement and cybersecurity, Angus Taylor, told Reuters: “Our laws regarding the interception of telecommunications data, the ability to access data for the purpose of investigating and prosecuting criminal activity are already outdated. Whether it's pedophiles, terrorists or drug dealers, we'll make sure we have modern legislation to deal with these people."
We will command the wind to rain ….
The state should come to terms with the fact that it simply cannot get into some communications. If two people meet in a gas station parking lot or somewhere on a forest road, the content of the conversation is also unknown.
.. but he will get, there will be no reconciliation, it will turn out exactly the same as in India and China. It is enough for states to push the saw hard enough and block encrypted protocols in networks. And it is done.
Until now, I considered Australia a democratic country, and it's the same crap as China. AppI support lu, he is one of the few who cares about users' privacy. After all, years ago after 11/9 I was against tightening airport controls, saying that I would risk flying with a terrorist, butancthere is somethingonečně malá a kontroly stejně útokům nezamezí, jen buzerují slušné lidi. A to samé platí o šmírování běžných lidí a narušování soukromí. Prostě teroristé si najdou jiný způsob jak si sdělit informace a stát jen bude šmírovat slušné lidi a omezovat případnou obranu. Takže jen ať Apple it lasts well and hardens easily. If the police asked me to check my encrypted data and they gave a reason for this (for example, that I am suspicious of something for some reason), I would comply, but thanks to the prohibition of encryption in many countries, I have encrypted disks even in PCs with Windows (I've been encrypting my Mac since I could) and I paid for an unlimited encrypted VPN. Or excessive restrictions will cause a response and even people who don't need it will start to hide what they are doing, because it's simply nobody's business.