CNBC has published an analytical report looking at the future direction Applu in the field of health and measuring body functions. The report provides three specific pieces of information that CNBC believes may indicate a new chip designed to process data from health sensors.
"Apple has a team working on a custom processor that should work better with data coming from health sensors located inside the device. In-house production and research will enable better integration into devices, increase the efficiency of hardware, and at the same time protect production processes from possible imitators."
You could be interested in
Apple he is currently designing the entire system that powers it Apple Watch including many parts and chips designed for specific tasks, such as wireless connectivity to other accessories. From the workshop Applu also comes with a coprocessor, which is iPhonech is used for step counting, for example. The analytical report also suggests that in the future we could see a much greater amount and type of data that the chips can measure and evaluate. We recently told you informed about the newly added Movement Disorder API, which will enable monitoring of Parkinson's disease symptoms.
Apple Watch Series 3:
Gallery
Renowned analyst Ming-Chi Kuo has predicted in recent months that the next Apple Watch they will come with a larger display, a changed design and improved heart rate monitoring. Those of you who own Apple Watch, certainly knows what a great helper for health and exercise a watch is. Apple is certainly well aware of this and is certainly planning to expand the port in the futurefolio offered health functions.
Above all, they should work a lot on sports activities. Before Apple Watch I had a Polar V800 and in training monitoring AW is like a child's toy next to the V800. It sucks a lot of things. The energy expenditure is clearly making it up. When I go spinning and have an average heart rate of 125, according to AW, I burn 100 kcal in 10 minutes. When I run and my heart rate does not drop below 160, I spend less time than when spinning. During an hour of swimming with a heart rate of around 150, I burned 800-900 kcal. If I run and my heart rate is 160 and I end the running activity and start walking outside to calm my heart rate, the energy expenditure is calculated not according to my heart rate, which is high because of the previous run, but according to the distance I walked. But that's only about 500m, because I'm out of breath. This is complete stupidity. It also doesn't count on any regeneration at all. I have a daily goal of 1000kcal. I will do it 5-6 days in a row. In order to accomplish this, I have to either run, cycle or spin every day, or I walk. After 6 days, when I have a fairly large portion of sport every day, it writes to me on the seventh day: "You are unstoppable, Jan. Are you going to extend your streak another day?” Like some sort of recovery or a fart. On the V800, when I put one day into my body, it then told me how long I had to do nothing to regenerate. It can't work with heart rate zones at all. It is clear that in this condition it is not suitable for professional training, and you do not see it at all in professional athletes. It's a shame because otherwise it's a nice device. I have many years of experience with training, so I adjust a lot of things, but for people who don't understand it very well, it can lead to overtraining, or the results will be worse than they could be.
But not to be rude, I like a lot of things about it. It's great that I don't have to wear a chest strap everywhere to measure my heart rate. When I bought the AW, I compared the accuracy of the chest strap with the measurement on my arm and it worked out great. The only thing where optical measurement on the arm has a weakness is when the heart rate changes quickly. Logically, it takes longer for the sensor to register it there. The chest strap does it right away. That's why when there are activities where the heart rate changes quickly (spinning, running), I use the chest strap, for other activities the optical sensor on the AW is enough. Of course, the combination iPhone, AW and Airpods is simply awesome. Dictating messages works great, music and calls without any problems. It's a shame that our operators don't allow eSim yet. That would be great when you can just go out with your watch and Airpods.