Apple recently there are a number of tablets iPad Air updated two years ago. This week he ended it for good and introduced The iPad, which is almost identical to its older siblings, just doesn't carry the name AirThere are some differences, however. So let's take a look at all three devices and compare them in this article.
You could be interested in
Let's face it, if you already have any of the Airs, upgrading to a new model is not really worth it. If you have an iPad 4 and older, then it's time to consider changing your device. By the way, owners of iPads 4 and older make up 30% of the user base. This is a relatively high proportion, considering that owners Airis only 5% more.
Original iPad Air It is the only one of the three compared that does not support Wi-Fi 802.11ac. Since this standard is mainly used by IT enthusiasts, it is not a reason for a "normal" home user to change the device. What you will definitely welcome, however, is a better rear camera compared to the first Airu. iPad Air 2 and the newly introduced iPad (2017) both have 8MP cameras.
Most of you already know that the new iPad is different from the previous one. AirIt's thicker and has also gained weight. This change is likely due to the larger battery that the new iPad contains. How much will the battery life change on a single charge after implementing a larger battery and changing the processor (iPad Air 2 has a triple-core processor, while the new iPad has a dual-core processor (it will only be revealed in time).
The new iPad's better specs also lead to better performance. The performance difference compared to the first Airu is significant, compared to Airbut there is a performance shift in 2 miniThe new iPad achieves its best performance using a single core, with multi-core performance comparable to a triple-core iPad Air 2. It should be noted that the benchmarks listed in the table are from the iPhone SE, which has an A9 processor running at 1,8 GHz. However, the processor in the new iPad is said to run at 1,85 GHz. However, we don't expect this change to make a big difference.
iPad Air It has essentially the same display as the iPad 3 and 4 – multitouch with LED backlighting and a scratch-resistant layer covered with glass. iPad Air The 2 relies on a fully laminated display (three layers in one) with an added anti-reflective coating. The new iPad has reverted to the older LED-backlit display design with a glass cover. In theory, this should make the new iPad easier to repair.
The new iPad excels in some aspects, but falls short in others when compared to the iPad Air 2 behind. The choice to buy or not to buy is now up to each of you. Owners of any generation of iPad Air they don't have too many reasons to upgrade and can currently see a decent return on investment. Apple practically introduced the same device that has been with us since the end of 2014. The refresh cycle of iPads is thus very similar to the cycle of computers, we also usually use them for 2 years or more.
Gallery
Source: appleinsider, GSM arena
Where is the money he supposedly has Apple cash? Certainly not in development. Only in recent years old stuff has been recycled. In the worst case, they don't even recycle (Mac Pro, iMac). The argument that they are great and don't need it is really weak, especially in the world of computers, where development is the fastest of all fields.
I also think it will test our patience. I don't have any plans to switch to an iPad.
You probably didn't understand that this was low end. iPad pro undemanding users instead iPad mini, not top tier equipment and an iPad showcase. It's like yelling that the Skoda Citigo doesn't have a two-liter turbo engine and xenons. Try it out
You're out :D
If I want to make a low cost iPad, I'll do it this way iphone SE, not that I'll take a 4 year old device and add touch id. I think that by taking the original ipad pro and it was sold cheaper, so it would make more sense. At the moment it's not really possible because the new ipad pro no. I don't understand why instead of the tech harakiri they're doing now they didn't take the A10X and stuff it into the new iPad Pros and the original A9 ones they put the cheaper A10 into the iPad mini and make it what it is now 9.7 just to not give it support pencil and smart keyboard. Such an iPad would make sense and would bring more low cost users. In addition, from macbookfor making a toy for non-professionals, the current liquidation of the case is another step towards apple will be a one-product company and that will be iphone.
And the RAM? What compared RAM?
I'm curious when they will introduce the Pro models and especially that it's not just a minor refresh.
Too angry.
Money in development is understandably reflected in iPad Pro.
Unfortunately, the creation of this class of iPad canceled the meaningful modernization of the original class, which he definitely had to move to the low-end.
Apple the iPad class has not mastered marketing, probably for the first time since the creation of the product category iOS.
Peacefully…
The old iPad is exactly for those who ignored the tablet due to its high price and size Mini im nestachila…
329,-€ is the price for which the iPad is good, if a person does not plan to work seriously on the tablet, but will use it for consumption...
(If you are a serious tablet user - only iPad PRO!!! )
That's exactly how I see it.