When Apple at the "Hey" conference Siri" almost three weeks ago introduced iPhone 6s, 6s Plus and with them Live Photos, I wondered what everyone was seeing in them, that they were actually just some kind of animations similar to gifs. However, I soon realized that Apple he took animations in his own way, implemented them cleverly into his ecosystem, and actually made them into something completely different. As soon as I got it less than 48 hours ago iPhone 6s in hand, I had to immediately 3D Touch display try it out new, great camera and with it, of course, Live Photos.
What is it really about? Live Photos are moving photos that record everything before and after the photo is taken. So you can take photos normally, but for all photos you will also be able to play back what happened 1,5 seconds before the photo was taken and 1,5 seconds after the photo was taken. As a result, the animation is 3 seconds long and, unlike gifs, it also contains sound. The resulting file consists of both photos and video, and in terms of data volume, it is only 2x larger than a regular photo, which is quite decent, since it is normally a 12 MPx photo. On the iPhone 6s, Live Photos are played by pressing harder on the 3D Touch display. You can even add a live photo as wallpaper and to the lock screen, where you can also play it by pressing harder on the display.
But I definitely don't think you'd use Live Photos all the time. It is a function that you only turn on when you expect the result to be interesting. It's a bit of a shame, because if you're trying to capture a certain moment that happened just before or just after you pressed the shutter, then Live Photo could save you and you'd at least have that moment for animation in the form of Live Photo . Otherwise, I think that thanks to Live Photos, users can create really interesting backgrounds for their iPhones or Apple Watch and I can already think of several interesting moments where I intend to use them.
What I would complain about live photos on the iPhone 6s is their complete non-smoothness. They cannot be compared to live wallpapers at all, which Apple serves on the iPhone 6s, because they are really beautiful and absolutely smooth. Live Photos sometimes seem like a short video that is missing some images. When you move faster, you will see a kind of stuttering, as if the moving object suddenly moved, even if there is a certain animation, it does not seem completely smooth. But with slower moving objects, the animation is seamless and looks much smoother, which you can actually see right on apple.com.
If I were to summarize everything at the end, I personally think that Live Photos is a nice function with which they can come up with really interesting things and make good use of it. Otherwise, I maintain the opinion that this is not one of the key features of the new iPhone 6s, which should make customers decide to switch to the latest Apple phone. This is a nice bonus to win and will help you capture more memories and immerse you a little better in the moment the photo was taken. You will certainly better remember the details, the atmosphere and everything else that was related to a particular photo.
In the video below you can see how Live Photos are taken and then played back. Note that you have to activate the function above for the live photo to be taken. You can also turn it off. In playback, you can then see the mentioned jerky movement during fast movement, as the fish suddenly quickly swam away from the shot.
What the first HTC had in the year One like Zoe, is now a sensation… Honestly, I don't like these pseudo-innovations in the AppI don't really enjoy it. I used to Apple defended this, today it seems quite embarrassing and funny to me, as if Applu has run out of trump cards and is just copying the same way Samsung does.
Rolf99
I totally agree with you. Almost everything Apple copied from others and with miniI have things that came second, third, fourth, etc.
Please explain just one thing to me. ProWhy are these innovative phones from LG Samsung Huawei etc. not selling...???!!!???
ProWhat is the order? Apple who just copies and makes you so angry? Proc is iPhone in sales of hundreds of millions of units and aren't your favorites the pioneers and pioneers in this field?
It is the law of the market and the market is the yardstick. ProBut your comments are embarrassing and laughable.
My last calfoneThe HTC Sensation was the last competitive phone from HTC.
Since the days of HTC One they just imitate and copy the iPhone's design, while HTC is not even able to understand that iPhone MMM is successful because of its high-quality photos, and they can never succeed with what they put in phones that they then sell for more than 15 thousand.
Sony's flagships are proof that Android is stable and can be a quality, fast and handy operating system. Then several Chinese companies that are not widespread on the European market. Most of the current leaders cram useless add-ons into Android that can kill the speed even on the most advanced hw available. Typically Samsung, yesterday I tried the phones offered by Samsung, the only ones that are somewhat usable are the S6, S6+ and Note4 (perhaps only because of its size, but the terrible back cover kills it, even the Chinese can make a phone with the same diagonal, the same or better performance and in a higher quality version, at the same time a third to a half cheaper). The movement in the menu of these top Samsung models does not seem smooth to me. Everything else that Smasung offers are overpriced plastic horrors. Even the cheap Sony M4 Aqua is a nice piece of phone. Honor 6 Plus too, where is Samsung going??
Panoramic photos were taken by the Sony Xperia Arc S, also long ago iPhonem, panorama, is one of the few attachments that I occasionally use with my camera, so I don't consider it pointless, but even so, it's nothing that I would consider important and I would decide whether to choose a mobile phone or not based on the presence of a panorama.
Google Camera app It already offers about three modes of different spatial photos. I will never use it in practice. Maybe the owners of Nexuses, with whose chips this one works appnicer photos.
I wouldn't even be surprised if he came in 3 years Apple also with some varia3D Panoramas like the ones on maps.google or a list on maps, analogous to what you can now take a picture of with Google Camera. But today, no one would be interested in that. Google is experimenting and will then kill or cancel a lot of quality services. Apple choose the best that exists and where there is potential for growth.
I'm guessing that Live Photos will be an alternative to sharing short videos on Twitter and Instagram.
bangs
LG is currently selling quite well, it is not possible to compare only sales. A lot of Chinese/non-Chinese lowend shite have high sales and yet they are not quality phones.
LG makes quality phones, Sony does too, Huawei (Honor 6+, Mate 7) does too, and for example LG offers some of the best Androids on the market among non-Chinese brands for the money, the G3 32GB/3GBRAM for 10K is an unbeatable phone, even if it's plastic. The LG G4 is for 14K, also a nice thin top model. Only the Sony Z2/Z3/Z3+/Z5 offer better ones. Meizu MX4/MX5 Pro (without CZe LTE), Xiaomi mi Note and Note Pro.
I think it's pretty cool how the new iPhones hold up under water...
http://www.idownloadblog.com/2015/09/26/iphone-6s-plus-submerged-water/
ProIt doesn't work on old people. iPhoneWhat? That 6 would do itoneI managed it too, the rest is a matter of software. I don't understand it.