Everyone, including our editorial team, is already expecting the latest iPhone 6s and iPhone The 6s Plus will definitely offer 2GB of RAM, but according to one who claims to be Apple developer, we are all wrong. A screenshot of a Geekbench 3 benchmark of the alleged iPhone 6s (iPhone 8,2) from the user Fabien Wannerwhich reveals that the latest iPhone will again offer only 1 GB of RAM, the same as iPhone 6/6 Plus and iPhone 5/5c/5s.
But the rest of the image confirms previous reports that iPhone 6s will offer Apple A9 processor with a clock speed of 2 GHz and of course iOS 9, which Apple presented already in June. If you're already cursing while reading this, so what Apple it performs again and why is it not able to add more operating memory to the iPhone, so stop. Fabien claims he is Apple developer, but that may not be true, because if it was, it would be difficult for him to reveal top secret news about the company's upcoming product under his name on Instagram Apple, as he would be fired immediately if someone from the company's management found out. Although the screen has already been deleted, she still managed to preserve a copy of it.
Plus the best Apple analyst, Ming-Chi Kuo, from KGI, has long claimed that iPhone The 6s will offer 2GB of RAM and he has not changed his claim yet. Kuo also announced that iPhone The 6s will offer LPDDR4 RAM, which is significantly faster than the LPDDR3 RAM in the iPhone 6, but also a bit more expensive. Kuo has previously revealed the company's upcoming plans several times. Apple and even hit the mark on the period when the company would introduce a product. The predictions were confirmed several times. Proof of this can be, for example, the introduction of the 12″ MacBookus Retina display and one USB-C toonewhich Kuo informed us about half a year before its actual introduction Applem.
*source: cultfmac
It also makes sense that it will be like that, that is, completely IOS 9 has been reoptimized from the ground up, so it won't have such high demands on the hardware, and also iphone it will not support full multitasking as in the case of the iPad air/ 2, on which you simply need more than 1 GB of RAM.. So I'm afraid that it will happen that the 6s will remain at 1 GB..
I think 1GB of RAM will be OK, considering where Apple directs his iOS.
Planned rumors straight from the PR department Apple. Free and about the new iPhone I will write to all the magazines and keynote they announce 2GB. Apple he will come out as a great savior.
Well, that's sad news. 1 GB ram nestopens the browser safari, which reloads the cards when switching them and that's quite a shame.
iPad Air 2 with 2GB of RAM eliminated this problem, safari it works perfectly and doesn't reload windows.
– it's recycling computersonentov for the purpose of a higher margin is sometimes harmful, 8 Mpx camera and 1 GB RAM are a thing of the past today
optimization is a nice thing, but why not put one extra gig there as security?
I don't really notice the optimization. iOS 7, iOS 8 to iOS 9 beta 5 is a fail regarding optimization.
fail? But go for it. Android barely runs on 3GB these days and Lolipop is pretty laggy too. So IOS It is super optimized compared to Android.
So that it is not the case that the 6S will have 1GB of RAM and will not have the new multitasking, and the 6S+ will have 2GB of RAM and will have the new multitasking.
Edward:
No one mentioned android here, everyone is still comparing ios 8.4 to ios 9 beta with older versions iosua is the fact that the last one is well optimized ios was about 6. Since then it is ios at the android level. Yes, Android sometimes crashes, I won't say that it doesn't, but ios it's definitely not any better and I'm not talking about safari, the application often freezes or terminates itself. Or it simply does not want to load the address. I only use it because it consumes less battery than chrome but sometimes I can't stand it and I prefer to use it chrome. I wonder how it will be optimized ios9 in the final version, but as far as I've read the comments of people who tried the beta, not much.
nostradamus please you. I have an Android(2GBram) product at home and when I turn on wifi and Chrome, so I can put the phone down. You're comparing the incomparable. IOS is still light years ahead of Android. In total, there are about five Android products in the family, two iPads and three iPhones and one unused one, and those Androids all have some kind of problem…
edur but I wasn't talking about android, I was talking about ios and about applications in ios, specifically I was talking about safari a chrome running on ios. I agree that android is problematic but if I had to say yes ios it's trouble-free, someone would have to pay me well for it or I'd have to be total apple fanatic. I used to be absolutely against it applu, but I changed my mind and admit that he is really good at something, etc ios even if it has bugs and isn't perfect, it's better than android. And as I read the comments from time to time, I'm sure there will be a lot of people who will agree with me. Everyone likes something different and everyone buys what suits them.
Edur: from my user perspective, it's a fail. Air when it came out it was slower to use than the 4th generation iPad iOS 6.1.3. I iP5 on iOS 6.1.4 is faster than the current version of the iPhone 6 and that's a huge fail considering that the phone has it. miniat least 2x faster chip. Don't bring Android here, I'm not interested, I just want an optimized system like the last time iOS 6 that's all.
Raakh I really don't remember how it went 6 years ago, I really don't have it stored in my brain by how many ms it was faster or slower, I'm with IOS on the iPad Airua IP 5S satisfied, I really don't remember any lag or hangs on IOS 8 or 7. That's enough for me to be happy.
I don't really care and always have. I'm never on iPhone he didn't address what his parameters are because it's useless….
Edur: from iOS 7 unfortunately there are lags and crashes and it doesn't matter if I pick up the iP6+ or Air and about the mistakes that were made iOS 8.4 is not even worth talking about. I don't care about 1-100 ms, but from 1000ms up it's crap and for the money it's going to suck, at least for me. Sometimes when I read comments here on the website, a lot of people have blinders on. I don't need Android and all of Google.