Apple he is currently openly fighting for gay rights, and his CEO has also significantly supported this fight Tim Cook, who openly admitted to homosexuality at the end of last year. Well, during the fight for equality, he managed to make a mistake, which he corrected as soon as he found out what it was about. Apple namely, he hired former politician Jay Love to lobby for the company in the state of Alabama Apple. However, as soon as he learned that the lobbyist had fought for anti-gay laws a few years ago, he immediately terminated his cooperation with him, as this is both against the interests of California society and on the other hand Tim Cook He comes from Alabama.
Controversial politician/lobbyist Jay Love in 2009 wanted to push for a California politician Carrie Prejean received the state's highest honor for publicly announcing her criticism of same-sex marriage. Love believed he deserved the honor for "holding on to your faith and standing up for your beliefs." That is why they want to honor her with this award.
I have no negative views against homosexuals, yet I don't understand why they should be "husbands". It's completely out of line with the principle of marriage, let alone children.
But that I would get fired from the company for this opinion? This smacks of discrimination...
Soon we will have to be absolutely tolerant of any minorities and our opinions will be scrutinized like before 1989.
With this step Apple he turned a man into a monster just for a different (and far from unique) opinion.
It is a matter of time when necrophiliacs, pedophiles, zoophiles will fight for their rights... They are also not responsible for their sexual orientation.
Hmm, that's fine, they don't mind colorful, yellow, black, and suddenly someone has a different opinion and gets a parachute?? That's really cool. I also don't agree with 4% marriage, it's against nature
Quick: I'll just digress to what you wrote, on the contrary, in nature in the animal kingdom, homosexuality is completely normal, so bisexuality, and among people in ancient cultures it was also normal and fully tolerated (ancient Greece...) the view on bisexuality and homosexuality turned around even after Christancyou and the church but until then it was completely normal that someone liked this and someone else that and some took everything...it's not against nature, on the contrary it's against nature to prohibit it but that itself is monogamy in nature it's normal to have multiple partners and have sex on a whim but in society it's been suppressed and condemned for a long time
I don't want to support any of the groups, I'm a tolerant heterosexual, and I just wanted to point out that from a scientific and historical point of view, it's not bad
I can't get rid of the impression that similar activities and preferences should not interfere with the work process at all. Especially if you don't show yourself at work.
And I'm not talking about percentage representation in society, which should rather rank them among those who respect the majority and not the other way around.
It is interesting that the employer may not ask you about your religion or sexual orientation. But if you are not IN and have something against you, you will get a parachute for it. I don't understand.
Appsman: but we didn't write that we were somehow bothered by homosexuals. We are bothered by the family/parenthood of homosexuals. And that's really not normal in nature.
You will hardly see two cats (monkeys/dogs/etc) raising kittens…
Bedrych (and Rychlik): Do you know what smacks of discrimination? That in more than half of the US states you can be fired based solely on your sexual orientation. TolerancFor any minorities, it reeks of common sense and recognition of basic human rights.
If you had a gay child, would you mind if he couldn't get married and have children? Would you be satisfied?
saddako: Pedophilia, necrophilia or zoophilia are not sexual orientations.
Danduli: So, for example, we ban making tools for left-handed people, they should also obey the majority. Heck, every life matters, and you wouldn't like it either. Everyone should adapt to everyone, and some percentage representation in society is completely out of place.
Sometimes a calf is born in nature and has two heads, and I don't think that's normal either. The fact that homosexual behavior of animals sometimes occurs in nature is not a sign that it is normal for me either!
Personally, I don't care what anyone does in the bedroom at home, but don't drag it among NORMAL people. As an employer, I really don't care about sexual orientation or ethnicity as long as the person does their job well. But if the bully starts making sexual insinuations about his colleagues, I'll kick him out of work and I really don't care what anyone here thinks of me. I would do the same thing if a guy harassed his female colleague like this at work.
ProI hope they stop telling me that their behavior is normal and that they don't bring their orientation out into the open and everything will be fine. At home, they can shove it wherever they see fit, but I'm going to stop marching for their rights, because it has the exact opposite effect and they only get from the point of "I don't care" to the point of "I don't give a damn".
Racists and homophobes have always been and always will be. Jarys ... go back to the center ;-)
There is homosexuality before the advent of Christianity during the time of Rome, where, by the way, pedophilia also thrived.
Homosexuality during the Roman Empire was understood differently than it is today, namely that the men of that time performed this activity among themselves during joint meetings for the purpose of trade or other negotiations. It was a form of strengthening the relationship. They had normal children and wives at home.
This was something that can be grasped from afar, like when during the first republic men went to a gentlemen's club, etc. However, these men mostly did not live together and did not form a classic family, in Rome the male body was considered to be perfect from God and was built higher than the female body , female homosexuality at that time did not have much value among ordinary citizens.
Banning homosexuality is just as bad as when a heterosexual has to hear and quote about it over and over again in the media. There is already a lot of it, and I would like it if electronic portals would write about what I have and homosexuality would stop being discussed. If there is a gentleman in your ranks who is inclined to do this and wants to show off his team, THANK YOU, I am not curious about his deviation.
What kind of guy doesn't like a piece of pretty babe…
Rey: sure I'd mind if my gay child decided not to have kids, but I'd mind even more if they raised an adopted child in a civil partnership.
But this is off topic. The topic is about ending cooperation with someone who has a different (conservative) opinion on marriage. It's exactly the same as firing someone with a different sexual orientation.