Yesterday when we posted a link to download the new wallpaper for OS X 10.9 Mavericks directly from the Apple.com, probably most readers who had this wallpaper I'm only interested in downloading and setting the background. However, if you open it in, for example, Preview and you choose the option to adjust the size, you will find that the background is really huge, that is, it is specifically in the resolution of 5120×2880 pixels, which is the resolution that is expected for the iMac Retina a Apple Thunderbolt Display RetinaThis is exactly twice the height and width of the 2560×1440 pixel resolution found in today's 27″ iMac and Apple Thunderbolt Display.
When Apple introduced Macbook Pro Retina, first hinted at its arrival by being part of the development team beta version of OS X Lion was a high-resolution background of 3200×2000 pixels. However, it is important to emphasize that since the developers first beta version got the background in Retina distinction MacBookfor Pro, expired until the actual release MacBook Pro Retina more than a year. It is possible that Apple We will see Thunderbolt Display later this year, when Apple will also release a brand new Mac Pro. Apple namely u Mac Pro During the presentation itself, he emphasized that one of the advantages is that it can offer 4K video to up to three displays simultaneously, but Apple does not currently have a 4K display on offer and is likely to want customers to Mac Pro bought another Apple product, just in the form of a new display Apple ThunderBolt Display Retina.
Standard 4K Ultra High Definition Television the resolution is 3840×2160 pixels with an aspect ratio of 16:9. Digital Cinema Initiatives 4K resolution is then 4096×2160 pixels. So if Apple introduces Thunderbolt Display Retina with a resolution of 5120×2880 pixels, it will again be a very fine display.
He's not chasing here Apple just numbers? I think that such a number of pixels on such a surface is far beyond the limit of recognition by the human eye
Fancku: I personally know the difference when I look at the iP30s from 4 cm and next to it I have iPad miniThe iP 4s has a resolution of 960 x 640 px and small fonts are more legible.
Francadditional:
Certainly not. It has to be the highest resolution for the biggest monitor, so it fits. For example, if a 27″ iMac had such a resolution, its density would be 218 PPI, which is, but still a number that the human eye can easily recognize.
If it was a number above 300 PPI, then it would be beyond the limit of pixel recognition by the human eye...
maybe you're not right either...
It's not true that you can't see a difference above 300 ppi
just look at iphone and for example htc one
there is a visible difference